05.02.2013 Views

plant surface microbiology.pdf

plant surface microbiology.pdf

plant surface microbiology.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

18 Mycorrhizal Development and Cytoskeleton 303<br />

is possible that the antibody used for IIF microscopical detection of MTs in<br />

Pinus is not able to recognize the MTs of cortical cells although it visualizes<br />

well MTs in meristem and vascular tissue. The MT cytoskeleton of cortical<br />

cells of Pinus could also be more sensitive to the processing of the samples<br />

for IIF microscopy than the MTs in meristem and vascular tissue. Interestingly,<br />

it has not been possible to visualize MFs in the cortical cells of short<br />

roots although plenty of MFs are seen in vascular tissue, where they were<br />

already visualized in the early days of the study of MFs in <strong>plant</strong> cells (Pesacreta<br />

et al. 1982).<br />

The structure of cell wall and cytoskeleton in differentiating cortical cells<br />

in short roots of pine is of special interest, since this is the region of the short<br />

root in which the ectomycorrhizal fungus invades and establishes the Hartig<br />

net. When root morphogenesis and ectomycorrhiza formation in Scots pine<br />

was studied (Niini et al. 1996; Tarkka et al. 1998), a group of polypeptides with<br />

molecular weight slightly above 43 kDa were observed to be short root-specific.<br />

By using peptide sequencing, it was shown that the polypeptides represented<br />

a group of peroxidases. By reverse genetics a full-length cDNA of one<br />

of the peroxidases, Psyp1, was cloned and sequenced (Tarkka et al. 2001). The<br />

signal sequence suggests that Psyp1 is secreted and could be involved in cell<br />

wall formation. In ectomycorrhiza Psyp1 expression is downregulated, which<br />

agrees with the idea that the growth of the fungal hyphae in the intercellular<br />

space might inhibit the cortical cell wall differentiation (Niini 1998). There<br />

may be signalling or linkages between adjacent <strong>plant</strong> cells that can regulate<br />

the organization of their cytoskeletal structures. This exchange of information<br />

might be mediated through plasmodesmata, or alternatively, through the<br />

intervening cell wall (Canut et al. 1998; Overall et al. 2001).<br />

Fig. 1. Microtubule cytoskeleton visualized with indirect immunofluorescence technique<br />

with a-tubulin antibody and viewed with laser scanning confocal microscopy in<br />

Pinus sylvestris short root (A) and ectomycorrhiza with Suillus bovinus (B). A In cortex<br />

only few microtubules are distinguished in the cortical cells with numerous round amyloplasts.<br />

In stele microtubules with mainly transverse orientation are abundant in elongating<br />

cells differentiating to vascular tissue. Strong vertical bands represent wall thickenings<br />

in a xylem cell. B Microtubules are hardly seen in pine cortical cells, but they are<br />

clearly distinguished as long tracks in hyphae forming the fungal sheath and penetrating<br />

into the root cortex. A,B Bars 20 mm. C–E Cytoskeletal elements in Suillus bovinus<br />

hyphae visualized with rhodamine-phalloidin staining of actin (C, D) and indirect<br />

immunofluorescence microscopy with a-tubulin antibody (E). C A strong actin signal at<br />

hyphal tip, D an actin ring at the site of the future septum. E Microtubule tracks in a<br />

hyphal branch. C–E Bars 10 mm

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!