05.02.2013 Views

plant surface microbiology.pdf

plant surface microbiology.pdf

plant surface microbiology.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

456<br />

Anton Hartmann et al.<br />

root <strong>surface</strong> colonization by a particular bacterial strain could be investigated<br />

in a background of other members of this species, identified by using rRNAtargeting<br />

probes and FISH.<br />

2.3 Application of Fluorescence Tagging and Reporter Constructs<br />

The fate of particular bacterial inocula in the rhizosphere can also be monitored<br />

using molecular-tagged bacteria. In addition to the use of the visually<br />

detectable lux- and gus-markers (Lux: luciferase, Gus: b-glucuronidase), the<br />

exploitation of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) from the jellyfish<br />

Aequorea victoria has brought further progress into the field. GFP is a protein<br />

that contains a fluorescent cyclic tripeptide sequence. It requires only molecular<br />

oxygen for fluorescence, which means that GFP will fluoresce in virtually<br />

any aerobic organism (Lorang et al. 2001). Therefore, GFP-labeled bacteria<br />

can be observed by CLSM or by regular fluorescence microscopy. Figure 2C, D<br />

shows a localization of GFP-labeled Serratia liquefaciens MG44 in the rhizoplane<br />

of tomato. Furthermore, the application of DsRed from Discosoma sp.<br />

provides a red fluorescing molecular marker (Christensen et al. 1999; Tolker-<br />

Nielsen et al. 2000). In addition, a mutated form of GFP (ASV) with a short<br />

half-life enables real-time in situ expression studies (Andersen et al. 1998;<br />

Ramos et al. 2000).<br />

The application of GFP-labeling in expression studies using promotor-gfp<br />

fusions and GFP fusion proteins has revolutionized the in situ activity studies,<br />

because of the relative ease of recording the fluorescence microscopically.<br />

The bacteria carrying the gene constructs either on a plasmid or integrated<br />

into the chromosome are applied to sense or report conditions in the microhabitat<br />

they have been introduced. As in the case of simple tagging of organisms,<br />

not only lux- and gus-reporter (Kragelund et al. 1997) were used, but<br />

also constructs using the ice-nucleation gene (Loper and Henkels 1997), or<br />

the ferrichrom iron receptor (FhuA; Stubner et al. 1994). These constructs<br />

allowed the in situ sensing of N-, P- and C-starvation response (Kragelund et<br />

al. 1997; Koch et al. 2001), expression of nitrogen fixation genes (Egener et al.<br />

1999), presence of oxygen (Hojberg et al. 1999), availability of iron (Loper and<br />

Henkels 1997) general activity and cell number (Unge et al. 1999), genotoxic<br />

effects (Stubner et al. 1994) or the presence of quorum-sensing signal molecules<br />

of the N-acylhomoserine lactone type (Steidle et al. 2001). Figure 2C<br />

provides an example of in situ localization of GFP-labeled Serratia liquefaciens<br />

MG44 on root hairs in the rhizosphere of tomato as a bright field picture<br />

with 488-nm excitation wavelength, while Fig. 2D shows the same sample as<br />

CLSM-picture with two excitation wavelengths (560 and 488 nm) making the<br />

RFP-labeled Pseudomonas putida isoF also visible.<br />

In some of these studies, bacterial cells with reporter constructs need to<br />

be extracted from the habitat for analysis (Koch et al. 2001). Although these

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!