05.02.2013 Views

plant surface microbiology.pdf

plant surface microbiology.pdf

plant surface microbiology.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

150<br />

Lukas Schreiber, Ursula Krimm and Daniel Knoll<br />

thomonas and Bacillus (Ercolani 1991; Morris et al. 1998). Cladosporium,<br />

Alternaria and Aureobasidium have been described as being abundant filamentous<br />

fungal species and Cryptococcus and Sporobolomyces were<br />

described as abundant yeast species in the phyllosphere (Andrews and Harris<br />

2000; Blakeman 1993).<br />

However, it must be mentioned that the description of the epiphyllic<br />

microflora up to now is exclusively based on an identification of the species<br />

after cultivation on standard media. However, it is well known today from<br />

environmental <strong>microbiology</strong> that many bacterial species cannot be cultivated<br />

with standard techniques (Amann et al. 1995). PCR-based approaches<br />

showed that the bacterial species composition of aquatic environments, but<br />

also of soil and rhizosphere communities, is much more complex and<br />

diverse as it was originally concluded from cultivation-based approaches<br />

(Marilley et al. 1998; Tiedje et al. 1999; Ogram 2000). A similar approach has<br />

rarely been carried out in the leaf <strong>surface</strong> and it is absolutely necessary in<br />

leaf <strong>surface</strong> <strong>microbiology</strong> in future in order to obtain a more realistic and<br />

complete picture of the species composition in the phyllosphere. Results of<br />

one of the first approaches, comparing the bacterial species identified using<br />

PCR versus cultivation-based techniques (Yang et al. 2001), in fact, yielded<br />

two quite different pictures of the species composition of the phyllosphere.<br />

This proves that our knowledge of the species composition on leaf <strong>surface</strong>s<br />

obtained from cultivation-based techniques is still rather limited and needs<br />

further research.<br />

4 Alteration of Leaf Surface Wetting<br />

Investigations of the seasonal development of leaf <strong>surface</strong> wetting have shown<br />

several times that leaf <strong>surface</strong>s become more and more wettable with increasing<br />

leaf age (Cape 1983; Turunen and Huttunen 1989; Cape and Percy 1993;<br />

Neinhuis and Barthlott 1998). This was normally attributed to chemical<br />

changes in the physico-chemical properties of the waxy leaf <strong>surface</strong> at the<br />

leaf/atmosphere interface caused by environmental pollution. In addition, it<br />

was shown that wax erosion due to the constant exposure of the leaf <strong>surface</strong> to<br />

wind, rain and the deposition of dust particles from the atmosphere to the leaf<br />

<strong>surface</strong> also occurs (van Gardingen et al. 1991), and may be further contributed<br />

to these observed increases in wetting. However, epiphyllic microorganisms<br />

as a further parameter contributing to an increased wetting of the<br />

leaf <strong>surface</strong> may not be neglected here.<br />

In simple model experiments, silanised glass <strong>surface</strong>s, which are rarely wetted<br />

by water due to their high hydrophobicity, were colonised by bacteria and<br />

wetting properties were quantified by measuring contact angles (Knoll and<br />

Schreiber 1998, 2000). From these experiments, it became obvious that already<br />

at a coverage of 10 % of the total <strong>surface</strong>, contact angles decreased by 25°

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!