05.02.2013 Views

plant surface microbiology.pdf

plant surface microbiology.pdf

plant surface microbiology.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

21 Carbohydrates and Nitrogen: Nutrients and Signals in Ectomycorrhiza 379<br />

response to the C-flux through the enzyme. Whether hexokinase phosphorylation<br />

or its association with other proteins is responsible for signal generation<br />

is still a mater of debate, but it is rather likely that the conformational<br />

changes of the enzyme during its enzymatic activity are sensed and not the<br />

generated hexose phosphates per se. The signaling pathways involve the activation/deactivation<br />

of the SNF1 protein complex that is presumably mediated<br />

by phosphorylation/dephosphorylation (AMPK kinase and REG1/GLC7<br />

phosphatase complex, respectively; Lesage et al. 1996; Johnston 1999). The<br />

sugar-dependent gene repression is mediated by a DNA-binding protein like<br />

MIG1 (yeast) or CREA (Aspergillus, Neurospora; Felenbok and Kelly 1996),<br />

acting as repressors.<br />

While in the pure fungal culture AmMst1 was induced and AmPAL<br />

repressed by elevated hexose concentrations, both genes were strongly<br />

expressed in entire mycorrhizas (Nehls et al. 1998, 1999a). It could thus be<br />

concluded that in mycorrhizas the sugar-dependent regulation of both genes<br />

is either modified by developmental events, or different in the sheath and Hartig<br />

net hyphae. To address this question, ectomycorrhizas were dissected and<br />

gene expression was investigated separately for hyphae of the fungal sheath<br />

and the Hartig net (Nehls et al. 2001a). Similar to low external hexose concentrations<br />

in pure fungal culture, AmMst1 was expressed only at the basal level<br />

in hyphae of the fungal sheath. In contrast, AmPAL revealed a high transcript<br />

level in this fungal structure. For Hartig net hyphae the opposite expression<br />

pattern was observed. As for hyphae in pure culture in the presence of high<br />

external hexose concentrations, the transcript level of AmMst1 was sixfold<br />

enhanced while the expression of AmPAL was only barely detectable.<br />

Owing to the opposite regulation of both genes in hyphae of fungal sheath<br />

and Hartig net that resembles the hexose-dependent expression of these<br />

genes in pure culture, different hexose concentrations in the apoplast of the<br />

fungus/<strong>plant</strong> interface (hexose concentration >2 mM) and the apoplast of the<br />

fungal sheath (hexose concentration 2 mM) could be assumed in<br />

the Hartig net that would trigger the observed hexose-dependent fungal gene<br />

expression. Fructose withdrawal from the apoplast presumably takes place<br />

mainly within the innermost one or two layers of the fungal sheath since fructose<br />

uptake by A. muscaria hyphae is rather efficient when the glucose concentration<br />

is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!