05.02.2013 Views

plant surface microbiology.pdf

plant surface microbiology.pdf

plant surface microbiology.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

a single copy gene of A. muscaria (SCIV038, Nehls et al. 2001) revealed PCR<br />

fragments in any case, indicating that no inhibitors of the PCR reaction were<br />

present in the genomic DNA preparation. The reason for false positives was<br />

most probably the low herbicide concentration in the growth medium.A concentration<br />

of 200 mg/ml Basta (as used in this study) results in fungal background<br />

growth. This relatively low Basta-concentration was chosen to recognize<br />

also lateral transfer of the resistance gene lacking its heterologous<br />

promoter. In this case, the bar-gene might integrate behind a weak A. muscaria<br />

promoter, resulting in only a weak herbicide resistance.<br />

The 35,000 mycorrhizas investigated in this study represent, of course, only<br />

a limited sample number. Nevertheless, since each mycorrhiza does contain a<br />

large number of competent fungal hyphae in direct contact with <strong>plant</strong> epidermal<br />

cells that die under the selection conditions, this sample number is large<br />

enough to reveal that HGT from the tree to the fungal partner is a quite rare<br />

or maybe completely missing event in EM symbiosis, at least under axenic<br />

conditions.<br />

5 Conclusions<br />

11 Interactions of Microbes with Genetically Modified Plants 191<br />

Taken together, many of the studies cited above demonstrate that transgenic<br />

<strong>plant</strong>s can induce changes in soil microorganism communities. Nevertheless,<br />

the importance of these findings is unclear as in most studies, the modifications<br />

in the rhizosphere of GMPs were not compared to the natural variance<br />

in the rhizosphere of different <strong>plant</strong> breeds generated by conventional methods.<br />

For example, the mycorrhization capacity of modern wheat varieties with<br />

high pathogen resistance has been shown to be reduced (Hetrick et al. 1992).<br />

Such potentially negative effects would be considered unacceptable in the<br />

case of any GMP introduced into agriculture.<br />

Concerning the investigations on HGT, there is some evidence for the possibility<br />

of HGT not only between bacteria, but also between <strong>plant</strong>s and<br />

microorganisms. In soil, HGT must be a rare event, as several attempts to<br />

detect HGT in field experiments failed. Despite the missing evidence for HGT<br />

in the field, the possibility of HGT should be kept in mind for risk assessment.<br />

The question to be answered in a case-to-case consideration is whether a possible<br />

rare HGT of the introduced genes from GMPs to microorganisms might<br />

cause specific problems. This is unlikely if the transgene itself is common in<br />

nature. For example, a natural transfer of the rolC gene from Agrobacterium to<br />

other bacteria seems much more likely than a HGT from the rolC transgenic<br />

aspen mentioned above to microorganisms. On the other hand, artificial<br />

genes generated by genetic engineering might have a high risk potential when<br />

released into nature.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!