31.07.2015 Views

Ocena zachowania użytkowników platformy handlu C2C - E-mentor

Ocena zachowania użytkowników platformy handlu C2C - E-mentor

Ocena zachowania użytkowników platformy handlu C2C - E-mentor

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

e-edukacja na świeciehave been found to be the most Figure 2: Practical Inquiry Modelconsistent predictors of successfulonline courses (Swan, 2002; 2003).Of the three components of teachingpresence, this is the one mostlikely to be performed exclusivelyby the instructor.Facilitating Discourse. Anderson,et. al (2001) conceptualize facilitatingdiscourse as the means bywhich students are engaged ininteracting about and buildingupon the information provided inthe course instructional materials.This role includes sharing meaning,identifying areas of agreementand disagreement, and seekingto reach consensus and understanding.Therefore, facilitatingdiscourse requires the instructor toreview and comment upon studentcomments, raise questions andmake observations to move discussions in a desired Cognitive Presencedirection, keeping discussion moving efficiently, draw Cognitive presence may be the least researched andout inactive students, and limit the activity of dominatingposters when they become detrimental to the presence that goes to the heart of a community of in-understood of the three presences, yet it is cognitivelearning of the group (Anderson et al., 2001; Brower, quiry. Cognitive presence has its genesis in the work of2003; Coppola et al., 2002).John Dewey and scientific inquiry (1933). For Dewey,Direct Instruction. Anderson, et. al. (2001) contextualizeddirect instruction as the instructor experience. The development of the cognitive pre-inquiry was at the core of a worthwhile educationalprovision of intellectual and scholarly leadership sence construct by Garrison, et. al (2000) is groundedin part through the sharing of their subject matter in the critical thinking literature and operationalizedknowledge with the students. They also contend that by the Practical Inquiry model (Garrison, Anderson &a subject matter expert and not merely a facilitator Archer, 2000, 2001).must play this role because of the need to diagnose The Practical Inquiry Model. The Practical Inquirycomments for accurate understanding, injecting model is defined by two axes. The vertical axis reflectsthe integration of thought and action. Thissources of information, and directing discussions inuseful directions, scaffolding learner knowledge to also emphasizes the collaborative nature of cognitiveraise it to a new level.presence and the need for community. The integrationIn addition to the sharing of knowledge by a of discourse and reflection (i.e., public and privatecontent expert, direct instruction is concerned with worlds) is a key feature of this model. Although weindicators that assess the discourse and the efficacy have identified these as two distinct processes, inof the educational process. Instructor responsibilities practice this dimensions (i.e., discourse and reflection)are to facilitate reflection and discourse by presentingcontent, using various means of assessment and iterations. The horizontal axis represents the interfaceare most often indistinguishable and instantaneousfeedback. Explanatory feedback is crucial. This type of the deliberation and action axis. The extremes ofof communication must be perceived to have a high the horizontal axis are analysis and synthesis. Theselevel of social presence/instructor immediacy (Arbaugh,2001; Baker, 2004; Gorham, 1988; Richardson et. al, 2000).are the points of insight and understanding (Garrison,& Swan, 2003) to be effective. Instructors must have While the axes provide the necessary theoreticalboth content and pedagogical expertise to make links frame of this model, in practical terms the focus is onamong contributed ideas, diagnose misperceptions, the phases of the inquiry process (triggering event,and inject knowledge from textbooks, articles, and exploration, integration, and resolution). It is importantto keep in mind that this is a process model thatweb-based materials. The simultaneous roles of discussionfacilitator and content expert within teaching has been telescoped for the sake of parsimony. As apresence goes beyond early contentions which online result, in practice, there will always be a degree ofinstructors needed merely to transition from a role fuzziness at the cusps of the phases. However, thisof knowledge disseminator to interaction facilitator. generally is only an issue when attempting to codeTeaching presence contends that for online learning to transcripts for research purposes.be effective, instructors must play both roles (Arbaugh Phases of the Inquiry Process. The first phase is a triggeringevent or initiation of the inquiry through the & Hwang, 2006).formal90 e-<strong>mentor</strong> nr 2 (24)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!