07.10.2013 Aufrufe

PDF 20.134kB - TOBIAS-lib - Universität Tübingen

PDF 20.134kB - TOBIAS-lib - Universität Tübingen

PDF 20.134kB - TOBIAS-lib - Universität Tübingen

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.

YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.

Exploring the patterns of urban growth across 26 European countries 2771<br />

settlement structures and for all countries of the European Union. The size of the 20 × 20 km<br />

grid was selected as a compromise between the intention to provide suf cient detail to detect<br />

regional patterns, and data accuracy limitations. Country measures were calculated either by<br />

computing aggregate statistics or mean values of all raster cells that cover a country.<br />

The mapping of indicators required processing of large amounts of geodata in a<br />

geographic information system. For most composition indicators, simple overlay techniques<br />

were suf cient to extract overlapping geographic features and transform aggregated indicator<br />

values to the reference grid. Pattern measurements were more complex to calculate, since<br />

they required spatial analysis techniques to assess the form and distribution of polygons<br />

within each cell of the reference grid. The work ows required iterations of analysis routines<br />

that were mostly implemented in ArcGIS model builder. In some cases, raster processing and<br />

conversion techniques were utilised to combine and integrate data formats within the vector<br />

analysis work ow (urban density, soil sealing). Detailed formulae for indicator calculation<br />

are given in the appendix; for further details see Siedentop and Fina (2010).<br />

3 Results<br />

Table 2 presents an overview of average indicator values on a country scale, starting with<br />

general information on the total land area and population size. Within this context, each<br />

country is then portrayed by the aggregated indicator results of the urban sprawl dimensions<br />

explained above (composition, pattern, density). The top- ve countries in terms of most<br />

sprawl-like indicator values are shaded grey in the respective cells. Selected maps complement<br />

these results and are discussed below.<br />

3.1 Change in land-use composition<br />

Most of our sample countries are characterised by uneven territorial distribution of urban<br />

land and growth of urban land. The maps in gure 2 illustrate the variations on the regional<br />

scale for the EU member states that provide CORINE data for 2006. (1) The base map of the<br />

urban land consumption within each cell [indicator 1, gure 2(a)] highlights the high levels<br />

of urbanisation in regions between the North Sea and the Black Sea. A large cluster of cells<br />

with more than 10% of urban area can be found in Belgium, in neighbouring parts of the<br />

Netherlands and Germany (the Rhine-Ruhr agglomeration and the southwestern parts of<br />

Germany), and northern Italy, divided by the Alps. This well-known Central European<br />

‘pentagon’ area represents the economic heart of Europe and therefore pressure on<br />

land resources is assumed to be above average here. In Southern Europe high levels of<br />

urbanisation are concentrated mainly in urban agglomerations along the coasts (apart from<br />

Madrid). Especially along the north Portuguese, the Spanish, and French Mediterranean<br />

coastlines a nearly closed belt of urban areas has emerged since the 1950s and the beginning<br />

of mass tourism in these regions.<br />

After normalisation by population density (indicator 2), a comparison of this urban area<br />

distribution against the European average shows that large parts of Scandinavia and the Baltic<br />

States, of France/Belgium/Luxemburg, and of the Eastern European countries (extending<br />

to Eastern Germany but excluding Poland) rank highest [normalized land consumption,<br />

gure 2(b) and table 2]. This aspect points towards a higher land consumption rate per capita<br />

in these areas which is an important measure for ef ciency assessments of urban structures.<br />

The deviation rates for this indicator in table 2 con rm these ndings on the national level.<br />

The distribution of urban areas seen here is certainly the legacy of hundreds of years of<br />

urban development. However, large parts have only been developed in recent years (growth<br />

of urban land, indicator 3 in table 2 and gure 3). The most prominent countries affected<br />

(1) Note that we have substituted the missing 2006 data for the United Kingdom and Greece with the<br />

2000 dataset.

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!