10.04.2013 Views

The numismatic chronicle and journal of the Royal Numismatic Society

The numismatic chronicle and journal of the Royal Numismatic Society

The numismatic chronicle and journal of the Royal Numismatic Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

76 NUMISMATIC CHRONICLE.<br />

types <strong>and</strong> even <strong>the</strong> same arrangement <strong>of</strong> details, vary<br />

considerably more in character than those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> succeeding<br />

period, from which <strong>the</strong>y are readily distinguished by<br />

<strong>the</strong> more archaic style <strong>of</strong> design, as well as <strong>the</strong> more irre-<br />

gular <strong>and</strong> unequal execution. Some specimens <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

earlier coins are extremely well figured by M. Beule at<br />

p. 35 <strong>of</strong> his invaluable work ; but he has scarcely done<br />

justice to this part <strong>of</strong> his subject, <strong>and</strong> might with advantage<br />

have given figures <strong>of</strong> several o<strong>the</strong>r varieties, which, though<br />

not marked by any important differences, afford evidences<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> comparative fluctuation <strong>and</strong> irregularity <strong>of</strong> design<br />

in <strong>the</strong> period preceding that when <strong>the</strong> coinage had settled<br />

down into <strong>the</strong> precise form that it permanently assumed. 8 I<br />

have <strong>the</strong>refore thought it worth while to figure a very re-<br />

markable coin belonging to this class, which was formerly<br />

in <strong>the</strong> cabinet <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> late Mr. W. R. Hamilton, <strong>and</strong> is<br />

now in my possession (PL IV. fig. 1). It differs mate-<br />

rially as a glance at <strong>the</strong> figure will show better than any<br />

description from any <strong>of</strong> those represented by M. Beule.<br />

<strong>The</strong> bold archaic character <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> head <strong>of</strong> Pallas on <strong>the</strong><br />

obverse contrasts singularly with <strong>the</strong> imperfect execution <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> reverse, on which not only are <strong>the</strong> letters A0E <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

sprig <strong>of</strong> olive very indistinctly marked, but even <strong>the</strong> legs <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> owl (usually made much more prominent than <strong>the</strong>y<br />

would really be) are so slightly represented as to look<br />

almost as if <strong>the</strong> engraver had in <strong>the</strong> first instance forgotten<br />

<strong>the</strong>m altoge<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>and</strong> only added <strong>the</strong>m as an afterthought.<br />

8 It is a sufficient pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> remarkable fixity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> type<br />

once established, during this long period, that we uniformly<br />

find <strong>the</strong> little sprig <strong>of</strong> olive (consisting only <strong>of</strong> two leaves <strong>and</strong> a<br />

berry) maintaining <strong>the</strong> same place, in <strong>the</strong> left-h<strong>and</strong> corner <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> field <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reverse, with a crescent immediately in front <strong>of</strong><br />

it. On <strong>the</strong> obverse, also, three leaves <strong>of</strong> olive <strong>and</strong> a spiral form<br />

<strong>the</strong> unvarying ornament <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> helmet <strong>of</strong> A<strong>the</strong>na.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!