05.05.2013 Views

View Document - Parliament of South Africa

View Document - Parliament of South Africa

View Document - Parliament of South Africa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

161 THURSDAY, 9 OCTOBER 2008<br />

162<br />

Serial<br />

No<br />

ates and Submarines is tabulated<br />

below:<br />

Vessel Capability<br />

Level<br />

a b<br />

1 Valour Class Frigates<br />

1.1 SAS AMATOLA Seagoing level <strong>of</strong><br />

capability<br />

1.2 SAS<br />

ISANDLWANA<br />

Seagoing level <strong>of</strong><br />

capability<br />

1.3 SAS SPIOENKOP Seagoing level <strong>of</strong><br />

capability<br />

1.4 SAS MENDI Maintenance Period<br />

(Presently)<br />

2 Heroine Class Submarines<br />

2.1 SAS ‘MANTHATISI Extended Maintenance<br />

Period<br />

2.2 SAS CHARLOTTE<br />

MAXEKE<br />

2.3 SAS QUEEN<br />

MODJADJI I<br />

Seagoing level <strong>of</strong><br />

capability<br />

Seagoing level <strong>of</strong><br />

capability<br />

(1) (b) As part <strong>of</strong> both Project SITRON<br />

(frigates) and Project WILLS<br />

(Submarines), it was decided to<br />

conduct a series <strong>of</strong> relatively small<br />

upgrades during normal scheduled<br />

maintenance periods, once the<br />

vessels were in <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>. This<br />

would add to the local content <strong>of</strong><br />

the vessels and obviously reduce<br />

the overall cost <strong>of</strong> the projects. It<br />

would also assist in the security<br />

classification <strong>of</strong> the actual operational<br />

capabilities <strong>of</strong> the two types<br />

<strong>of</strong> vessels (in-house contractual<br />

work versus outsourced via the<br />

vessels’manufacturers). These upgrades<br />

were planned activities<br />

and, as such, fall under the overall<br />

project costs.<br />

Frigates. The frigates have had a small<br />

addition to its accommodation facilities<br />

to allow for more trainees/additional<br />

personnel to be carried on board. In<br />

addition, a helicopter control radar has<br />

been added as part <strong>of</strong> the plan to<br />

integrate the Super Lynx helicopters<br />

acquired under Project MAULSTIC.<br />

This plan also added certain electrical<br />

power points additionally required to<br />

maintain the helicopter in the frigates’<br />

hangers. Planned s<strong>of</strong>tware upgrades on<br />

combat suites have taken place in order<br />

for all frigates to remain under the same<br />

baseline. The lessons learnt from the<br />

deployment <strong>of</strong> the SAS AMATOLA to<br />

the UK to conduct a NATO inspection<br />

have led to a number <strong>of</strong> small damage<br />

control issues being addressed. All <strong>of</strong><br />

these upgrades will have been completed<br />

by the end <strong>of</strong> this financial year<br />

except for the addition <strong>of</strong> a remotelycontrolled<br />

close-in weapon system<br />

(<strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>n manufactured and to be<br />

completed by end 2009).<br />

Submarines. This project was a ‘‘turnkey’’<br />

project producing operational<br />

submarines from the outset. No significant<br />

upgrades are envisaged except for<br />

the normal s<strong>of</strong>tware improvements to<br />

existing equipment. However, certain<br />

technical tests have been conducted to<br />

ensure that the boats comply with<br />

international obligations (these are the<br />

first submarines in the world to have<br />

been inspected as a class by the Germanisher<br />

Lloyd ship classification<br />

organisation). In addition, the boats<br />

have been fitted for integration with<br />

international rescue submersibles as<br />

per the project plan.<br />

(1) (c) Maintenance in the SA Navy is<br />

planned and executed in various<br />

periodicities, ranging from daily,<br />

weekly, monthly, four-monthly,<br />

annually, etc. The most significant<br />

<strong>of</strong> these are the four-monthlymaintenance<br />

events which are<br />

thus used as the basis for measurement<br />

<strong>of</strong> maintenance status.<br />

Maintenance returns are due three<br />

times a year, namely end <strong>of</strong> January,<br />

end <strong>of</strong> May and end <strong>of</strong> September.<br />

Due to operational com-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!