20.06.2014 Views

Tunisia: Understanding Conflict 2012 - Johns Hopkins School of ...

Tunisia: Understanding Conflict 2012 - Johns Hopkins School of ...

Tunisia: Understanding Conflict 2012 - Johns Hopkins School of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

epresented a complete departure from the Ben Ali regime, whereas the former legal<br />

opposition parties were tainted by their involvement in the old political system.<br />

Although Ennahdha has captured a significant share <strong>of</strong> votes, commentators are<br />

quick to note that the majority <strong>of</strong> votes were cast for secular parties. Many on the Left<br />

interpret this to mean that Ennahdha’s influence can be countered if the secular parties<br />

simply unite under one banner in the next election. Ahmed Ibrahim, secretary <strong>of</strong> the<br />

liberal, secular Ettajdid party, supports such an interpretation, and when asked if there<br />

were any other lessons to draw from the election, he said no (SAIS group meeting, 25<br />

January <strong>2012</strong>). A fuller accounting <strong>of</strong> the secular parties’ varying performance, however,<br />

would note several other factors. After all, the CPR outshone other secular parties,<br />

despite consistently polling behind the PDP and Ettakatol before the election. Similar to<br />

Ennahdha, CPR represented a clean break from the past regime. The party had remained<br />

outside <strong>of</strong> the formal political system under Ben Ali and thus was not tainted by<br />

association. The other two dominant secular parties, Ettakatol and the PDP, both had<br />

been legally recognized opposition parties and were seen by some as remnants <strong>of</strong> the old<br />

system. The CPR reinforced the notion that it represented a new era <strong>of</strong> politics by<br />

refusing funding from corporations, signaling the end <strong>of</strong> big business in politics. Also,<br />

CPR was not as openly hostile to Ennahdha as Ettakatol and the PDP, with the party’s<br />

leader hinting at the possibility <strong>of</strong> aligning with Ennahdha in the Constituent Assembly<br />

(Radio France Internationale, 22 July 2011).<br />

A look at the factors behind Ettakatol’s surge ahead <strong>of</strong> PDP, which had been<br />

ahead in the polls, is also instructive. Lacking the financing <strong>of</strong> other top parties, Ettakatol<br />

nevertheless showed that it was possible to overcome this by: 1) building a strong<br />

grassroots operation using volunteers to go door to door; and 2) effectively using social<br />

media. The PDP, by contrast, hired an expensive New York-based advertising firm to<br />

craft slick messaging and all but ignored field organizing. Furthermore, its ads featured<br />

the images <strong>of</strong> the party’s leaders Ahmed Nejib El Chebbi and Maya Jribi, harkening back<br />

to the personality-driven politics <strong>of</strong> the old regime (Interview with Laryssa Chomiak,<br />

SAIS group meeting, 26 January <strong>2012</strong>). As one analyst noted, <strong>Tunisia</strong> is a small country<br />

<strong>of</strong> 10.5 million where word <strong>of</strong> mouth can be an incredibly powerful force. In the case <strong>of</strong><br />

99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!