Tunisia: Understanding Conflict 2012 - Johns Hopkins School of ...
Tunisia: Understanding Conflict 2012 - Johns Hopkins School of ...
Tunisia: Understanding Conflict 2012 - Johns Hopkins School of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
terms <strong>of</strong> campaigning, the political pendulum could swing toward the secularists. The<br />
large problem for the secularists in the political process is that their identity is inherently<br />
complex. Their ideas are not easily made into a slogan, quickly understood through<br />
something to which the population can relate, and do not easily resonate based on identity<br />
dynamics. Ideas need to have either an institutional mechanism, usually law, to explain<br />
them or include them within the public sphere. Alternatively or additionally, ideas need<br />
to resonate with identity. These are the two ways in which an idea can take on a<br />
particular resonance and power within society. The religious side has both aspects for the<br />
Arab-Muslim <strong>Tunisia</strong>n. The secular side does not.<br />
The Current Diversity <strong>of</strong> Opinions on Secularism in <strong>Tunisia</strong><br />
While the organizational and practical electoral impediments are important to explore in<br />
<strong>Tunisia</strong>, the most important in the long term is the ideological divergence among<br />
secularists. There are two basic groups, the laïque secularists and those that for the<br />
purpose <strong>of</strong> this chapter will be called religious secularists. Interestingly, anyone with<br />
whom we spoke that declared him or herself as part <strong>of</strong> Ennahdha or more religiously<br />
inclined could actually be a part <strong>of</strong> this latter group. Also important to note is that many<br />
Ennahdha leaders discussed their desire to follow the AK Party model in Turkey. While<br />
there are many critiques <strong>of</strong> Turkish secularism, democracy, and the similarity between<br />
the AK Party and Ennahdha, the seeming desire <strong>of</strong> Ennahdha to exist within a framework<br />
<strong>of</strong> some separation between religion and state is important to the viability <strong>of</strong> the argument<br />
<strong>of</strong> this chapter. Rachid Ghannouchi sees himself as following the path <strong>of</strong> the AK Party as<br />
a moderate Islamic party trying to break the strict secularism <strong>of</strong> the past while remaining<br />
democratic. The secularists should join him in this desire to create a more viable<br />
framework for the relationship between religion and state. In an inchoate democracy, it is<br />
important to hammer out these ideological differences to form a system that in the long<br />
run has a capacity to function for the interests <strong>of</strong> the country.<br />
44