20.06.2014 Views

Tunisia: Understanding Conflict 2012 - Johns Hopkins School of ...

Tunisia: Understanding Conflict 2012 - Johns Hopkins School of ...

Tunisia: Understanding Conflict 2012 - Johns Hopkins School of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

terms <strong>of</strong> campaigning, the political pendulum could swing toward the secularists. The<br />

large problem for the secularists in the political process is that their identity is inherently<br />

complex. Their ideas are not easily made into a slogan, quickly understood through<br />

something to which the population can relate, and do not easily resonate based on identity<br />

dynamics. Ideas need to have either an institutional mechanism, usually law, to explain<br />

them or include them within the public sphere. Alternatively or additionally, ideas need<br />

to resonate with identity. These are the two ways in which an idea can take on a<br />

particular resonance and power within society. The religious side has both aspects for the<br />

Arab-Muslim <strong>Tunisia</strong>n. The secular side does not.<br />

The Current Diversity <strong>of</strong> Opinions on Secularism in <strong>Tunisia</strong><br />

While the organizational and practical electoral impediments are important to explore in<br />

<strong>Tunisia</strong>, the most important in the long term is the ideological divergence among<br />

secularists. There are two basic groups, the laïque secularists and those that for the<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> this chapter will be called religious secularists. Interestingly, anyone with<br />

whom we spoke that declared him or herself as part <strong>of</strong> Ennahdha or more religiously<br />

inclined could actually be a part <strong>of</strong> this latter group. Also important to note is that many<br />

Ennahdha leaders discussed their desire to follow the AK Party model in Turkey. While<br />

there are many critiques <strong>of</strong> Turkish secularism, democracy, and the similarity between<br />

the AK Party and Ennahdha, the seeming desire <strong>of</strong> Ennahdha to exist within a framework<br />

<strong>of</strong> some separation between religion and state is important to the viability <strong>of</strong> the argument<br />

<strong>of</strong> this chapter. Rachid Ghannouchi sees himself as following the path <strong>of</strong> the AK Party as<br />

a moderate Islamic party trying to break the strict secularism <strong>of</strong> the past while remaining<br />

democratic. The secularists should join him in this desire to create a more viable<br />

framework for the relationship between religion and state. In an inchoate democracy, it is<br />

important to hammer out these ideological differences to form a system that in the long<br />

run has a capacity to function for the interests <strong>of</strong> the country.<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!