20.06.2014 Views

Tunisia: Understanding Conflict 2012 - Johns Hopkins School of ...

Tunisia: Understanding Conflict 2012 - Johns Hopkins School of ...

Tunisia: Understanding Conflict 2012 - Johns Hopkins School of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Short-term<br />

• Secular parties must further consolidate. They must create a digestible platform<br />

and be more unified in a way that is easily understood.<br />

• The secular parties must start thinking more seriously about an alternate form<br />

<strong>of</strong> secularism other than laïcité. An alternate form <strong>of</strong> secularism would bypass the<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> the religious issues that have been taking up too much <strong>of</strong> the media<br />

time. Once the religious issues are bypassed, the key issue <strong>of</strong> economic development<br />

will be dealt with more rigorously. A focus on economic development as the primary<br />

problem facing <strong>Tunisia</strong> is necessary for <strong>Tunisia</strong>n democracy to have the legitimacy <strong>of</strong><br />

functioning.<br />

• The shift in secular ideology should manifest either along the American model or<br />

the European. The American is where each religious group is separate from the<br />

power structure and treated equally. The European is where there is an <strong>of</strong>ficial<br />

religion and the <strong>of</strong>ficial toleration <strong>of</strong> every other religion. While in some ways some<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> the French laïcité and the American model is what existed in <strong>Tunisia</strong><br />

before the revolution, the secular parties have to redefine themselves if the<br />

relationship between religion and state will be protected within a democratic state<br />

framework. A shift in the model <strong>of</strong> religion and state could allow the<br />

institutionalization <strong>of</strong> tolerance rather than the granting <strong>of</strong> it by a leader. If the<br />

discussion was redefined, both religious and secular parties would feel more protected<br />

and, thus, more capable <strong>of</strong> working together. While historically and currently there is<br />

a desire to see the Turkish model as a viable option, it is not. While there is not the<br />

space to deal with this sufficiently, the Turkish model fosters intolerance between<br />

religious and secular groups and does not have foster trust in a system that will<br />

protect all citizens despite the party in power.<br />

Medium-term<br />

• The Secularists must moderate their political platform and create a digestible<br />

platform. More moderate political platforms would yield a lack <strong>of</strong> polarization and<br />

the continued moderate nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tunisia</strong>n society. This would be a powerful<br />

48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!