Tunisia: Understanding Conflict 2012 - Johns Hopkins School of ...
Tunisia: Understanding Conflict 2012 - Johns Hopkins School of ...
Tunisia: Understanding Conflict 2012 - Johns Hopkins School of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Short-term<br />
• Secular parties must further consolidate. They must create a digestible platform<br />
and be more unified in a way that is easily understood.<br />
• The secular parties must start thinking more seriously about an alternate form<br />
<strong>of</strong> secularism other than laïcité. An alternate form <strong>of</strong> secularism would bypass the<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> the religious issues that have been taking up too much <strong>of</strong> the media<br />
time. Once the religious issues are bypassed, the key issue <strong>of</strong> economic development<br />
will be dealt with more rigorously. A focus on economic development as the primary<br />
problem facing <strong>Tunisia</strong> is necessary for <strong>Tunisia</strong>n democracy to have the legitimacy <strong>of</strong><br />
functioning.<br />
• The shift in secular ideology should manifest either along the American model or<br />
the European. The American is where each religious group is separate from the<br />
power structure and treated equally. The European is where there is an <strong>of</strong>ficial<br />
religion and the <strong>of</strong>ficial toleration <strong>of</strong> every other religion. While in some ways some<br />
combination <strong>of</strong> the French laïcité and the American model is what existed in <strong>Tunisia</strong><br />
before the revolution, the secular parties have to redefine themselves if the<br />
relationship between religion and state will be protected within a democratic state<br />
framework. A shift in the model <strong>of</strong> religion and state could allow the<br />
institutionalization <strong>of</strong> tolerance rather than the granting <strong>of</strong> it by a leader. If the<br />
discussion was redefined, both religious and secular parties would feel more protected<br />
and, thus, more capable <strong>of</strong> working together. While historically and currently there is<br />
a desire to see the Turkish model as a viable option, it is not. While there is not the<br />
space to deal with this sufficiently, the Turkish model fosters intolerance between<br />
religious and secular groups and does not have foster trust in a system that will<br />
protect all citizens despite the party in power.<br />
Medium-term<br />
• The Secularists must moderate their political platform and create a digestible<br />
platform. More moderate political platforms would yield a lack <strong>of</strong> polarization and<br />
the continued moderate nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tunisia</strong>n society. This would be a powerful<br />
48