Tunisia: Understanding Conflict 2012 - Johns Hopkins School of ...
Tunisia: Understanding Conflict 2012 - Johns Hopkins School of ...
Tunisia: Understanding Conflict 2012 - Johns Hopkins School of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
strong relationships across organizations through their participation in the initiative<br />
(SAIS Group Meeting, 28 January <strong>2012</strong>).<br />
The recent large-scale grassroots nature <strong>of</strong> civil society development in <strong>Tunisia</strong> is<br />
unprecedented. Communities in the interior <strong>of</strong> the country—always having been<br />
politically disaffected and less prosperous than the coastal populations—are setting up<br />
local development groups, pooling community resources to implement projects. Another<br />
new trend in <strong>Tunisia</strong>n civil society is the linkages between civil society organizations and<br />
political parties. This type <strong>of</strong> open association with a political party would have been<br />
seen as a direct challenge to the regime during the Ben Ali regime, but now political<br />
parties see civil society groups as an effective way to expand their reach to the<br />
community level. Ennahdha has been particularly effective in using civil society to garner<br />
support through a network <strong>of</strong> Islamic groups loyal to the party. It is unclear to what<br />
extent NGOs are funded directly using party funds, but <strong>Tunisia</strong>ns did point out that<br />
Ennahdha did maintain impressive patronage networks through the country.<br />
Meanwhile, back in Tunis, representatives <strong>of</strong> civil society are attempting to<br />
register a high-pr<strong>of</strong>ile success demonstrating their influence in a <strong>Tunisia</strong>n democracy.<br />
170 civil society activists including lawyers, pr<strong>of</strong>essors, youth representatives, and heads<br />
<strong>of</strong> human rights and development organizations gathered to form a parallel constituent<br />
assembly with a mission to monitor and provide a check on the <strong>of</strong>ficial body. At the<br />
body’s plenary session on 23 January <strong>2012</strong>, one <strong>of</strong> the assembly’s prominent members,<br />
the Secretary General <strong>of</strong> the Foundation <strong>of</strong> Arab Democracy Moshen Marzouk, described<br />
the body as “not a platform <strong>of</strong> opposition or <strong>of</strong> loyalty,” but with a mission “to<br />
strengthen civil society participation in the development <strong>of</strong> the new constitution and to<br />
support the work <strong>of</strong> the National Constituent Assembly.” When asked whether the<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficial assembly had given its blessing to its civil society counterpart, one activist said<br />
that he interpreted the <strong>of</strong>ficial body’s silence in response to the organization <strong>of</strong> the<br />
parallel body as approval. This seems a dubious claim and could simply mean that the<br />
National Assembly has chosen to ignore civil society and get on with the work <strong>of</strong> writing<br />
a constitution.<br />
122