24.10.2014 Views

Review of 2010 – USD version - Skanska

Review of 2010 – USD version - Skanska

Review of 2010 – USD version - Skanska

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

North America and Latin America<br />

During <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Skanska</strong> USA Civil was awarded assignments that included<br />

port renovations at the U.S. Navy facility in Portsmouth, Virginia, with<br />

a contract amount <strong>of</strong> about <strong>USD</strong> 0.2 billion. <strong>Skanska</strong> USA Building<br />

received two construction management assignments in Ontario, Canada<br />

with a total contract value <strong>of</strong> about <strong>USD</strong> 0.4 billion; two construction<br />

management assignments related to a hospital in Florida and a large<br />

industrial facility in Arizona, with a total contract amount <strong>of</strong> about<br />

<strong>USD</strong> 0.2 billion; and two major healthcare projects in California with a<br />

total contract amount <strong>of</strong> about <strong>USD</strong> 0.3 billion. During <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Skanska</strong>’s<br />

two American construction business areas received a joint contract<br />

related to the new PATH commuter train station in the World Trade<br />

Center area <strong>of</strong> New York City, where <strong>Skanska</strong>’s share <strong>of</strong> the total order<br />

amount was about <strong>USD</strong> 0.4 billion. In Latin America, <strong>Skanska</strong> Latin<br />

America’s orders included an assignment at an oil refinery in Brazil,<br />

where <strong>Skanska</strong>’s share <strong>of</strong> the total contract amount is about <strong>USD</strong> 0.2 billion.<br />

<strong>Skanska</strong> Latin America also received the assignment to carry out a<br />

highway project in Ant<strong>of</strong>agasta, Chile with a contract amount <strong>of</strong> about<br />

<strong>USD</strong> 0.2 billion. The project is being carried out as a public-private partnership,<br />

in which <strong>Skanska</strong> Infrastructure Development owns the concession<br />

and is responsible for financing.<br />

Order bookings and backlog<br />

Order bookings Order backlog<br />

<strong>USD</strong> M <strong>2010</strong> 2009 <strong>2010</strong> 2009<br />

Business unit<br />

Sweden 5,623.2 2,850.8 4,852.0 2,147.6<br />

Norway 1,798.0 1,473.1 1,499.2 1,268.9<br />

Finland 1,204.9 821.2 867.7 659.4<br />

Poland 950.9 1,823.9 1,317.4 1,680.4<br />

Czech Republic 941.5 1,170.8 1,234.6 1,544.8<br />

United Kingdom 2,074.1 2,641.1 3,456.1 3,407.9<br />

USA Building 3,548.3 3,890.0 4,505.2 4,123.4<br />

USA Civil 989.0 1,548.9 3,059.2 3,667.8<br />

Latin America 1,104.5 608.0 828.0 493.6<br />

Total 18,234.3 16,827.8 21,619.4 18,993.9<br />

Order backlog<br />

Order backlog increased by 14 percent and totaled <strong>USD</strong> 21.6 (19.0) billion<br />

at the end <strong>of</strong> <strong>2010</strong>. Adjusted for currency rate effects, order backlog<br />

increased by 14 percent. Order backlog was equivalent to about 16 (13)<br />

months <strong>of</strong> construction.<br />

North American and Latin American, Nordic and other European<br />

operations accounted for 39, 33 and 28 percent <strong>of</strong> order backlog,<br />

respectively.<br />

The portion <strong>of</strong> order backlog that is planned for execution during<br />

2011 was equivalent to <strong>USD</strong> 11.5 billion at closing day exchange rates.<br />

Segment and IFRS reporting<br />

Effective from January 1, <strong>2010</strong>, the Group is reporting its Residential<br />

Development and Commercial Property Development segments<br />

according to a new segment reporting method. The new segment<br />

reporting method recognizes sales revenue and gains on the divestment<br />

<strong>of</strong> properties, residential as well as commercial, when binding<br />

sales contracts are signed. When reporting in compliance with IFRIC<br />

15, revenue and gains on divestment <strong>of</strong> properties are recognized when<br />

the purchaser takes possession <strong>of</strong> the property or home. The differences<br />

between the two methods, with regard to revenue and operating income,<br />

are summarized in the tables below.<br />

Revenue<br />

Revenue by business stream according to segment reporting<br />

<strong>USD</strong> M <strong>2010</strong> 2009<br />

Construction 15,706.6 17,037.5<br />

Residential Development 1,051.7 855.1<br />

Commercial Property Development 644.8 594.0<br />

Infrastructure Development 44.3 19.7<br />

Central and eliminations –568.5 –759.0<br />

Total revenue according to segment reporting 16,878.9 17,747.3<br />

Reconciliation with IFRSs 77.8 431.7<br />

Total revenue according to IFRSs 16,956.7 18,179.0<br />

Revenue according to segment reporting declined by 5 percent to<br />

<strong>USD</strong> 16.9 (17.7) billion, primarily due to decreased revenue in<br />

Construction. In local currencies, the revenue decline was 8 percent. In<br />

the Construction business stream, revenue declined in <strong>USD</strong> by 8 percent<br />

and in local currencies by 9 percent. Revenue in Residential Development<br />

and Commercial Property Development increased due to more<br />

signed sales contracts during <strong>2010</strong> compared to 2009. <strong>USD</strong> 1.4 (1.3) billion<br />

<strong>of</strong> revenue in Construction, equivalent to 8.9 (7.6) percent, was generated<br />

by <strong>Skanska</strong>’s project development operations. To reconcile with<br />

IFRSs, add the revenue from the homes and properties that were sold<br />

during prior periods but were handed over during the year. Then subtract<br />

the homes and properties that were sold during the year but where<br />

the purchaser had not yet taken possession.<br />

Operating income<br />

Operating income by business stream according to segment reporting<br />

<strong>USD</strong> M <strong>2010</strong> 2009<br />

Construction 608.8 636.4<br />

Residential Development 77.6 –2.1<br />

Commercial Property Development 127.6 101.9<br />

Infrastructure Development 41.2 24.4<br />

Central –109.9 –88.9<br />

Eliminations –4.6 4.1<br />

Operating income according to segment reporting 740.7 675.8<br />

Reconciliation with IFRSs 16.5 112.5<br />

Operating income according to IFRSs 757.2 788.3<br />

Operating income according to segment reporting amounted to<br />

<strong>USD</strong> 740.7 M (675.8), with Residential Development accounting for<br />

the largest improvement compared to the preceding year. Earnings in<br />

Commercial Property Development and Infrastructure Development<br />

also improved compared to the preceding year. Earnings in Construction<br />

decreased somewhat less than the pace <strong>of</strong> the downturn in revenue. Currency<br />

rate effects increased the Group’s operating income by <strong>USD</strong> 22.3 M.<br />

Impairment losses on current and non-current assets including<br />

goodwill were charged to operating income in the amount <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>USD</strong> 34.7 M (57.2). To reconcile with IFRSs, add the revenue from the<br />

homes and properties that were sold during prior periods but were<br />

handed over during the year. Then subtract the homes and properties<br />

that were sold during the year but where the purchaser had not yet taken<br />

possession.<br />

Construction<br />

In the Construction business stream, operating income decreased by<br />

4 percent and amounted to <strong>USD</strong> 608.8 M (636.4). The operating margin<br />

improved compared to the preceding year and amounted to 3.9<br />

(3.7) percent. The margin was positively affected because there was a<br />

relatively larger share <strong>of</strong> projects at the end <strong>of</strong> the project cycle than at<br />

the beginning. Net project revaluations occurred primarily in <strong>Skanska</strong><br />

Sweden, <strong>Skanska</strong> USA Civil, <strong>Skanska</strong> USA Building, <strong>Skanska</strong> UK and<br />

<strong>Skanska</strong> Poland, while net project impairment losses occurred primarily<br />

in <strong>Skanska</strong> Finland and <strong>Skanska</strong> Norway. In Norway, earnings<br />

were affected by a positive nonrecurring effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>USD</strong> 14.2 M due to<br />

changes in the Norwegian pension system. Recovered bidding costs in<br />

<strong>Skanska</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>USD</strong> <strong>version</strong> Report <strong>of</strong> the Directors 71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!