01.11.2014 Views

Short Range Transit Plan 2008-2013 - Omnitrans

Short Range Transit Plan 2008-2013 - Omnitrans

Short Range Transit Plan 2008-2013 - Omnitrans

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IBI GROUP<br />

SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN REPORT<br />

OMNITRANS COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONAL ASSESSMENT<br />

& SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN<br />

SERVICE<br />

The three sets of service maps were based on a half-mile walking distance to a bus route, which<br />

represents the current <strong>Omnitrans</strong> standard. The first map was limited to the network of services that<br />

operate every 15 minutes or better (Figure 5-6 and Figure 5-7). The second map was based on services<br />

that operate every 30 minutes or better (Figure 5-8 and Figure 5-9), while the final map was based on all<br />

services that operate every 60 minutes or better (Figure 5-10 and Figure 5-11).<br />

In the next step of the analysis the populations living within a half-mile of each level of service (15-minute,<br />

30-minute, or all headways) were determined. The data drawn from the maps in Figure 5-6 through<br />

Figure 5-11 were then used to calculate the total populations, LIM and non-LIM populations within a halfmile<br />

walking distance of the service. The results consistently found that the populations within the<br />

walking distance zone had a higher proportion of LIM residents to non-LIM residents. For example, the<br />

proportion of LIM residents within a half-mile of any bus service was 55.3%, compared to the total service<br />

area proportion of 52.4% LIM residents. This population of LIMs also represents 89.1% of all LIMs living<br />

in the service area (Figure 5-12).<br />

Figure 5-12: LIM and Non-LIM Populations Served by <strong>Omnitrans</strong><br />

Total<br />

POP<br />

Total<br />

Non-<br />

LIM<br />

Total<br />

LIM<br />

%<br />

Non-LIM<br />

% LIM<br />

% of<br />

Total<br />

Non-LIM<br />

% of Total<br />

LIM<br />

Service Area 1,278,077 608,448 669,629 47.6% 52.4%<br />

Half-mile of Any (60-Minute and less) Service<br />

Within 1,078,367 481,927 596,440 44.7% 55.3% 79.2% 89.1%<br />

Not Within 199,710 126,521 73,189 63.4% 36.6% 20.8% 10.9%<br />

30-Minute Service<br />

Within 824,994 338,191 486,803 41.0% 59.0% 55.6% 72.7%<br />

Not Within 453,083 270,257 182,826 59.6% 40.4% 44.4% 27.3%<br />

15-Minute Service<br />

Within 328,384 104,286 224,098 31.8% 68.2% 17.1% 33.5%<br />

Not Within 949,693 504,162 445,531 53.1% 46.9% 82.9% 66.5%<br />

FACILITIES<br />

The table in Figure 5-13 shows that at stops with benches or shelters, the proportion of LIM population<br />

exceeds that of the LIM in the general population. For example, 63.7% of the population within a halfmile<br />

of a shelter is LIM, compared to the overall system where 52.4% of the population within a half-mile<br />

of any stop is LIM. Overall 54.0% of the population within a half-mile of a stop with a shelter is LIM,<br />

compared to 33.9% that is not LIM.<br />

The maps in Figure 5-14 and Figure 5-15 illustrate the distribution of passenger facilities or amenities in<br />

the <strong>Omnitrans</strong> service area. The maps specifically identify bus stops with or without benches and<br />

shelters. An analysis was conducted to determine if <strong>Omnitrans</strong> was meeting its Title VI obligations by<br />

ensuring that the distribution of passenger amenities does not discriminate against LIM populations.<br />

July 11, 2007 112

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!