25.11.2014 Views

Developmental psychology.pdf

Developmental psychology.pdf

Developmental psychology.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Cognition and Language 207<br />

Occasionally a single sound takes on meaning, as when the chimpanzee Washoe<br />

emitted the cry "Oh, oh, oh, oh," which was roughly equivalent to no. Human beings<br />

may vocalize "mmmm," signifying contentment or agreement, and the article a means<br />

one. In these instances the phoneme functions as a morpheme, which is the smallest<br />

language unit with a distinct and separate meaning.<br />

A morpheme is usually composed of several phonemes. The word animal, which<br />

has a separate and distinct meaning, is a morpheme, and it includes half a dozen different<br />

sounds. The word train is a morpheme. The word trainer has two morphemes;<br />

there is the verb and also the suffix er, signifying an agent. Morphemes are words,<br />

coherent parts of words, and sometimes small combinations of words.<br />

When morphemes are arranged in appropriate ways to form phrases, clauses,<br />

and sentences, the outcome is known as syntax. Syntax is one aspect of grammar, but<br />

it is not concerned with pronunciation or correctness of word choice. It is chiefly a<br />

matter of sequence. It is concerned with the ways in which words and series of words<br />

are combined into language.<br />

The importance of syntax is illustrated in this improbable English sequence:<br />

"Furiously sleep ideas green colorless." The word furiously is unlikely to be followed<br />

by sleep, which is unlikely to be followed by ideas, and so forth. Even the opposite<br />

sequence is improbable. Colorless is unlikely to be followed by green, which is unlikely<br />

tCKbe followed by ideas, and so forth. Yet the second expression is considerably closer<br />

to a meaningful English statement than is the first: "Colorless green ideas sleep furiously"<br />

(Chomsky, 1957). Thus we see that the organization among a group of words,<br />

or syntax, contributes significantly to the overall meaning.<br />

To summarize, the basic elements of any language are single sounds called<br />

phonemes, which are combined to form small units of meaning, known as morphemes.<br />

These expressions are then organized according to certain rules, or syntax, to form still<br />

larger units.<br />

Problem of Meaning Sophisticated language includes two additional features that<br />

go beyond the formal structure. These are semantics and pragmatics, which pertain<br />

to language in a particular culture. They concern the ways in which language is related<br />

to other aspects of the society. They are therefore of lesser importance in the present<br />

context.<br />

We can note in passing that semantics concerns meaning in a broad sense. It<br />

involves the full range of rules and cust6ms that pertain to meaning. When a breakdown<br />

in communication occurs, it may be attributed to "a problem in semantics," which<br />

implies that something went wrong apart from phonemes, morphemes, and syntax.<br />

Words carry two types of meanings, denotative and connotative. The denotative<br />

meaning points to something; it indicates something specific. The denotative<br />

meaning of the word chimpanzee is much the same for all of us—a hairy primate with<br />

upright posture. The semantic system is concerned largely with these denotative meanings.<br />

The connotative meaning involves abstract qualities, often with emotional implications.<br />

In its connotative meaning, the word ape implies a coarse, clumsy person—<br />

someone with poor manners and lacking in coordination. Connotative meaning concerns<br />

the experience people have with certain words—the associations words bring to<br />

mind, such as feelings of respect or disdain, pleasure or disgust (Goodenough, 1981).<br />

The issue of pragmatics concerns the relations between language and its users.<br />

It deals with the work that language does in a particular situation, rather than referential<br />

meaning, apart from context. The person referred to as an ape perhaps becomes<br />

indignant and responds by saying, "Who me?" Or the person retorts: "You could not<br />

be referring to yours truly!" The choice of the word me or yours truly is a question of<br />

pragmatics, which involves language at the interpersonal level.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!