25.11.2014 Views

Developmental psychology.pdf

Developmental psychology.pdf

Developmental psychology.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

24 Background and Methods<br />

Each of the Christs had adjusted to the various demands of the commission,<br />

just as he had learned to cope with the research team, which was almost always present.<br />

None of them discarded their delusional thinking, even after two years of exposure<br />

to all sorts of research efforts, including more letters, more discussions, and special<br />

efforts by staff members to form individual therapeutic relationships. The men developed<br />

their delusional thinking for some reasons, currently unknowable, and apart from<br />

some superficial changes in Leon's identity, probably related to his need to appear consistent<br />

in this context, these delusions were not significantly altered as a consequence<br />

of the confrontations.<br />

Problem of Commitment Will the three Christs therefore spend the rest of their<br />

days under institutional supervision? The answer is probably affirmative, though<br />

discussion of personality disorders and the effectiveness of therapy are subjects for later<br />

chapters. We can only say here that after the research was terminated, the three men<br />

for a while could be seen in pairs or all together in the sitting room. But soon Leon<br />

reverted to eating alone. Too much time had passed, it seemed, for he had been in<br />

custodial confinement for five years. Clyde was about seventy; Joseph was close to sixty;<br />

and both had been institutionalized for almost two decades.<br />

This issue of involuntary commitment, in which an individual is placed in a<br />

mental institution against his or her will, raises another ethical question. It is a practical<br />

matter, concerning freedom in everyday life, not a matter of research or licensure.<br />

What should be done when someone behaves in a way that meets with disapproval<br />

from the family, society, or others? This question divides psychologists, lawyers, and<br />

also laypersons (Wanck, 1984).<br />

Suppose that out-patient psychological or psychiatric treatment has been unsuccessful,<br />

as in the case of Clyde, Joseph, and Leon. Should the law permit someone<br />

to commit someone else to a state hospital? If so, what standard should be used in<br />

making this commitment?<br />

Experts agree that the standard should include the presence of mental disorder,<br />

but this condition is extremely difficult to define. Leon sometimes showed highly<br />

lucid thinking, and on other occasions his thoughts were bizarre indeed.<br />

Some experts argue that the standard should include dangerousness to the self<br />

and others, but here again the decision is difficult. An angry person holding a loaded<br />

gun and claiming to be a simple Christian boy psychiatrist probably would be considered<br />

dangerous. Leon never behaved in this way, but what about a man who averts his<br />

eyes whenever a brassiere advertisement appears on the television? Suppose this same<br />

man says to a woman who innocently obtains a light from his cigarette: "Please, madame,<br />

no suggestive touching with the hand." This behavior certainly tarnishes the<br />

reputation of that individual and perhaps others, but does it constitute mental disorder?<br />

"I'm sorry," the woman replied to Leon, "I didn't intend anything."<br />

According to one viewpoint, mental disorder alone, assuming it can be accurately<br />

identified, is sufficient to permit confinement of an individual to a mental institution.<br />

The argument here is that the individual, when improved, will be thankful for<br />

the commitment (Stone & Church, 1975). This position, of course, assumes that some<br />

improvement will occur, which is a debatable issue. The polar opposite is that involuntary<br />

commitment is an evil that should be abolished (Szasz, 1977). And between<br />

these two positions lie the views of many other experts, indicating that the question of<br />

involuntary commitment is a persistent ethical issue for <strong>psychology</strong> and for society as<br />

a whole.<br />

Interdisciplinary Issues The relation of <strong>psychology</strong> to law, education, medicine,<br />

and other professions is of great significance to society. Just between <strong>psychology</strong> and<br />

law, for example, there is a wide variety of complex ethical and social issues: the custody<br />

of children, which becomes a legal and psychological question when each spouse seeks<br />

separate custody as a fit parent; punishment and rehabilitation, an issue in criminal<br />

law involving the psychological principles of deterrence, rehabilitation, and therapy;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!