25.11.2014 Views

Developmental psychology.pdf

Developmental psychology.pdf

Developmental psychology.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

504 Psychology and Society<br />

Figure 18.17—<br />

Conformity as Obedience. In<br />

contrast to the psychiatrists'<br />

predictions, 100 percent of the<br />

subjects administered 300 volts or<br />

more (Milgram, 1963).<br />

Designation and<br />

Voltage Indication<br />

Slight shock<br />

15<br />

30<br />

45<br />

60<br />

Moderate shock<br />

75<br />

90<br />

105<br />

120<br />

Strong shock<br />

135<br />

150<br />

165<br />

180<br />

Very strong shock<br />

195<br />

210<br />

Number of Subjects<br />

Who Administered<br />

This Shock as<br />

Maximum<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

Designation and<br />

Voltage Indication<br />

Intense shock<br />

255<br />

270<br />

285<br />

300<br />

Extreme intensity shock<br />

315<br />

330<br />

345<br />

360<br />

Danger: severe shock<br />

XXX<br />

375<br />

390<br />

405<br />

420<br />

435<br />

450<br />

Number of Subjects<br />

Who Administered<br />

This Shock as<br />

Maximum<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

5<br />

4<br />

2<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

26<br />

225<br />

0<br />

240<br />

0<br />

did so even when the learner no longer responded to the task and therefore was being<br />

punished for doing nothing. In the remaining cases the research was discontinued when<br />

the subject refused to administer a stronger shock, but no one refrained from administering<br />

300 volts, labeled "intense shock," at which point4he learner pounded on the<br />

wall and then became silent (Figure 18.17).<br />

Actually, the learner never received any shocks at all. As an accomplice of the<br />

experimenter, he disconnected the generator. The subjects applied greater and greater<br />

voltage at the experimenter's request, but in response they simply heard a tape recording<br />

of the accomplice pounding, yelling, and cursing in the next room.<br />

These findings are seen by some as a very important contribution to our understanding<br />

of conformity. The obedience was far greater than one would expect, indicative<br />

of the unthinking obedience of Hitler's hideously cruel SS troups during World<br />

War II. Others see the cruelty as residing within the investigator, who designed this<br />

diabolical investigation, duping his subjects and persuading them to perform this distasteful<br />

task (Milgram, 1964; Baumrind, 1964). This question of research ethics is a<br />

critical one, which was raised in the first chapter of this book.<br />

Would the members of the <strong>psychology</strong> class perform in the same manner? Yes,<br />

in all probability they would, unless they were previously familiar with this study. There<br />

is evidence that obedience would be even greater with changes in the research procedure,<br />

using people from diverse racial and social backgrounds in this research (Brant,<br />

1980).<br />

Altruistic Behavior<br />

Our concern has been with an individual's responsiveness to a deviant authority, and<br />

there was much greater compliance than even the experts predicted. Here we might<br />

emphasize once again that <strong>psychology</strong> is far more than common sense. At other times<br />

the findings are just what one would expect, and that outcome is not disturbing. As

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!