25.01.2015 Views

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Arthur</strong> R. <strong>Butz</strong>, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Hoax</strong> of the <strong>Twentieth</strong> <strong>Century</strong><br />

contacted by Jewish propagandists and that he forwarded at least some of their<br />

“information” to Rome. Examples that Burzio transmitted to the Vatican were<br />

March 22 claims that the Germans were taking young Jewish women from their<br />

families to make them prostitutes for German soldiers on the eastern front (a<br />

complete fantasy) and an early 1943 letter from a Bratislava priest claiming that<br />

both Jewish and responsible German sources had told him of soap factories supplied<br />

with the bodies of gassed and machine-gunned Jews. Whether Burzio forwarded<br />

such material purely as routine procedure or because he gave credence to<br />

it is hardly relevant, although the later appears to be the case. <strong>The</strong> Vatican received<br />

and filed many such reports during the war, but never gave any credence to<br />

them. Its present position is that, during the war, neither it nor the “Jewish agencies<br />

were aware that the deportations were part of a general mass annihilation operation”<br />

(see also Appendix E). 165<br />

In any case it is obvious that the WRB report is spurious. <strong>The</strong> data given in the<br />

report is not the sort of information that escapees would carry out; the claim that<br />

two more Jews escaped later on to supplement this data is more than doubly ridiculous.<br />

Instead of coming forward immediately after the war with ostensible authors<br />

of the report in order to lend more support to the lie, it appears that it was<br />

assumed that the whole thing was irrelevant until, for some reason (probably<br />

Reitlinger’s curiosity), an author was produced sixteen years after the event. That<br />

person’s story is not credible.<br />

Thus was born the Auschwitz legend.<br />

165<br />

128<br />

New York Times (Apr. 27, 1974), 7. Actes et documents, vol. 8, 476, 486-489; vol. 9, 40, 178n.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!