25.01.2015 Views

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Arthur</strong> R. <strong>Butz</strong>, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Hoax</strong> of the <strong>Twentieth</strong> <strong>Century</strong><br />

Case 11. SS Colonel Kurt Becher, representative in Hungary of the SS Führungshauptamt<br />

(and thus of Himmler), served the prosecution at the IMT. In fact none<br />

of the principals unquestionably involved in whatever were the German measures<br />

relative to the Hungarian Jews stood trial at Nuremberg or (with the exception of<br />

Eichmann) anywhere else. Eichmann was missing at the time of the Nuremberg<br />

trials, and the others gave evidence for the prosecution of those whose involvement<br />

had been at most peripheral.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Producers<br />

Nobody should be surprised to find the most sordid practices behind these trials.<br />

We have seen in Chapter 1 (pp. 40-43) that no ethical limitations were respected<br />

in the means sometimes employed to produce “evidence.” We should,<br />

therefore, take a closer look at who was in charge in Case 11. Recall that there<br />

was no substantial “indictment” process involving a grand jury, and that, as one<br />

may confirm by reading DuBois‘ book, it was the prosecution in each case that<br />

decided who was to be put on trial and with what he was to be charged.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Wilhelmstrasse Case was not really commensurate with the other cases<br />

tried before the NMT; all of the latter had had special purpose characters, as Table<br />

4 shows (p. 35). <strong>The</strong> Ministries or Wilhelmstrasse Case, however, was somewhat<br />

like a “little IMT,” that is, people from an assortment of German government ministries<br />

were put on trial and the trial had a correspondingly wide scope. Thus, it<br />

was split into an “economic ministries section” and a “political ministries section,”<br />

each of which had different prosecution staffs.<br />

<strong>The</strong> important section from our point of view and, indeed, the most politically<br />

important case to come before the NMT was the political ministries section of<br />

Case 11, whose chief prosecutor was Robert M. W. Kempner, who has quite a<br />

history. It is very useful to present a short summary here of the “high” points of<br />

his career.<br />

Kempner, a Jew, was born in Germany in 1899, studied law, and joined the<br />

Prussian Ministry of Interior during the Twenties. In the years 1928-1933, he was<br />

a senior counsel for the Prussian State Police (under the Ministry of the Interior)<br />

and specialized in investigating the rising Nazi Party. He became an anti-Nazi<br />

crusader in his official capacity and energetically attempted, without success, to<br />

have the party outlawed.<br />

When the Nazis took over the German government in 1933, he was dismissed<br />

from his government position, but although Jewish, he was able to continue his<br />

legal practice for a short while as a counselor in international law and Jewish migration<br />

problems and also, apparently, as legal counsel for the German taxi drivers’<br />

organization. Whether or not he spent any time in a camp or in some other<br />

form of detention is not clear. In any case, he moved to Italy in 1935 to take an<br />

administrative and teaching (political science) position at a small school in Florence.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Mussolini government closed the school in 1938, so the school and<br />

200

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!