25.01.2015 Views

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Arthur</strong> R. <strong>Butz</strong>, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Hoax</strong> of the <strong>Twentieth</strong> <strong>Century</strong><br />

Rogge also involved himself in the widely publicized “Trenton Six” murder<br />

case of 1948-1953 as a lawyer for the “Civil Rights Congress.” In December<br />

1949, the judge barred him from the New Jersey trial for :<br />

“[…] violating the lawyers’ canons of ethics by denouncing the conduct of<br />

the trial in public, by showing ‘studied discourtesy and contempt’ in the court<br />

and by ‘deliberately distorting the facts.’ [<strong>The</strong> judge also charged that] the<br />

Civil Rights Congress […] collected more money from the public than was<br />

needed for the trial.”<br />

Seven months later, a U.S. court held that Rogge’s barring from the trial was<br />

wrong but did not order his restoration. 295 This short discussion of Rogge suffices<br />

for our purposes.<br />

To return to Kempner. When the Bonn government had been newly constituted<br />

in 1949, he warned of incipient Nazism there. Such a view did not prevent<br />

him from serving, two years later, as Israel’s representative to Bonn in negotiations<br />

relative to the restitution of Jews who had suffered injury at the hands of the<br />

Nazi government. However, the next month he was attacking the reprieves and<br />

reductions of sentences of “war criminals” that had been granted by the U.S. 296<br />

Kempner next appeared in connection with the 1952 House investigation of<br />

the Katyn Forest massacre, a well known Russian atrocity whose handling by the<br />

IMT throws full light on the absurdity of that tribunal’s claim to respect.<br />

On April 13, 1943, the Germans announced that, in the Katyn Forest near the<br />

city of Smolensk in Russia (mid-way between Minsk and Moscow), mass graves<br />

of Polish officers who had been captured by the Russians in 1939 had been uncovered.<br />

Four days later the minister of defense of the Polish government in exile<br />

(in London) announced that he was requesting the International Red Cross to<br />

make an inquiry. <strong>The</strong> Germans supported the proposed inquiry but the Russians<br />

opposed it, referring to the London Poles as “Hitler’s Polish collaborators,” and<br />

on April 26 broke diplomatic relations with that government over the matter.<br />

On account of the Russian opposition, the Red Cross refused to get involved.<br />

However, the German government exhibited the Katyn mass graves to various<br />

parties of Poles, to a group of foreign newspaper correspondents, to a group of<br />

German journalists, to small parties of British and American POW’s, to a technical<br />

team of the Polish Red Cross and, most importantly, to an international commission<br />

of experts in forensic medicine (specialists in rendering medical opinions<br />

in legal proceedings). <strong>The</strong> commission concluded with a report which demonstrated<br />

the certainty that these Polish officers had been murdered by the Russians<br />

prior to the outbreak of war between Russia and Germany in June 1941.<br />

When the graves had first been discovered, the German propaganda service,<br />

not knowing how many bodies were to be found there but knowing the approximate<br />

number of Polish officers who could have been involved as victims, used the<br />

figure of 10,000 and 12,000 as the number of bodies discovered, and these were<br />

the figures which were given the widest publicity during the war. Consequently,<br />

at the IMT, the indictment charged the Germans with murdering 11,000 Polish of-<br />

295<br />

296<br />

206<br />

New York Times (Dec. 17, 1949), 1; (Jul 22, 1950), 32.<br />

New York Times (Sep. 30, 1949), 2; (Jan. 12, 1951), 7; (Feb. 2, 1951), 8.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!