25.01.2015 Views

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Joseph Goebbels<br />

Chapter 6: Et Cetera<br />

Finally, there are a number of remarks in <strong>The</strong> Goebbels Diaries but, as the<br />

“Publisher’s Note” explains, the “diaries were typed on fine water-marked paper”<br />

and then “passed through several hands, and eventually came into the possession<br />

of Mr. Frank E. Mason.” Thus, the authenticity of the complete manuscript is very<br />

much open to question, even if the authenticity of much of the material can be<br />

demonstrated somehow. Interpolation with a typewriter is simple. <strong>The</strong> original<br />

clothbound edition of the “Diaries” even contains a U.S. government statement<br />

that it “neither warrants nor disclaims the authenticity of the manuscript.”<br />

Wilfred von Oven, who was an official in the Goebbels Ministry and became,<br />

after the war, the editor of the right wing German language Buenos Aires journal<br />

La Plata, had come forward with a curiously eager endorsement of the authenticity<br />

of <strong>The</strong> Goebbels Diaries. However, the net effect of his comments is in the reverse<br />

direction, for he tells us that (a) the diaries were dictated from handwritten<br />

notes (which were subsequently destroyed) by Goebbels to Regierungsrat Otte,<br />

who typed them using the special typewriter, having characters of almost 1 cm<br />

height, that was used for typing the texts that Goebbels used when he gave<br />

speeches (!) and (b) Oven “often observed” Otte, at Goebbels order, “carefully<br />

and precisely as ever” burning these pages toward the end of the war after having<br />

made microfilms of them. <strong>The</strong> point of the latter operation, as Goebbels is said to<br />

have explained to Oven in the April 18, 1945, entry in the latter’s diary (which<br />

was published in 1948/1949 in Buenos Aires), was that Goebbels “had for months<br />

taken care that his treasure, his great secret, result and accumulation of a more<br />

than twenty year political career, his diary, will remain preserved for posterity but<br />

not fall into unauthorized hands.”<br />

This strange story of Oven’s at least throws some light on the reference to an<br />

unusual typewriter in Louis P. Lochner’s Introduction to the Diaries. If Oven’s<br />

account is true, then it is possible that persons unknown obtained the special typewriter<br />

or a facsimile and a set of the microfilms and manufactured an edited and<br />

interpolated text. However, it is next to impossible to believe that Goebbels’ diaries<br />

were indeed transcribed as Oven has described. 346<br />

<strong>The</strong> Einsatzgruppen<br />

<strong>The</strong> remaining part of the extermination legend is that the Einsatzgruppen exterminated<br />

Russian Jews in gasmobiles and by mass shootings. This is the only<br />

part of the legend, which contains a particle of truth.<br />

At the time of the German invasion of Russia in June 1941, there was a Führer<br />

order declaring, in anticipation of an identical Soviet policy, that the war with<br />

Russia was not to be fought on the basis of the traditional “rules of warfare.” Necessary<br />

measures were to be taken to counter partisan activity, and Himmler was<br />

346<br />

Lochner, 126, 138, 147f, 241, viii. Oven’s remarks are in Nation Europa (Apr. 75), 53-56.<br />

241

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!