25.01.2015 Views

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 6: Et Cetera<br />

the people who took part in this conversation kept the tape or whether the<br />

tape was erased and re-used for other recordings.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> defense challenged the accuracy of the documents, claimed that the majority<br />

of marginal corrections were not included in the document, and further<br />

claimed that if Sassen himself could be brought to court to testify, it could be<br />

proved that:<br />

“[…] he changed and distorted what was said by the accused, to suit his<br />

own aims. He wanted to produce a propaganda book; this can be proved, how<br />

the words were distorted.”<br />

However, the prosecution assured the court that if Sassen were to come to Israel,<br />

he would be put on trial for his SS membership.<br />

<strong>The</strong> court decided to admit the photostats of the 83 pages in Eichmann’s hand,<br />

but the prosecution, finding during the course of the rest of the trial that there was<br />

virtually nothing in the 83 pages that it could use, made another bid very late in<br />

the trial and finally managed to get accepted into evidence the excerpts of the<br />

typewritten document which carried handwritten corrections. Life magazine,<br />

which apparently received the same material from Sassen, treated all of it as unquestionably<br />

authentic. 327<br />

We close this short discussion of the Eichmann trial by reporting Eichmann’s<br />

reaction to the allegation, widely publicized, that at the end of the war he had declared<br />

that he would “jump gladly into the grave” with the knowledge that five or<br />

six million Jews had been killed. Eichmann testified that he had, indeed, made a<br />

bitter remark such as this to his staff at the end of the war, but that the five million<br />

killed were not “Jews” but “enemies of the Reich,” i.e. enemy soldiers, principally<br />

Russians. While his defense strategy entailed not contesting the general reality of<br />

the extermination program, he insisted that he was in no position to know even the<br />

approximate number of Jews killed, and that all remarks attributed to him in this<br />

connection (e.g. Höttl’s affidavit) are falsely attributed. 328<br />

West German Trials<br />

<strong>The</strong> trials held in West Germany during the Sixties are barely worth mentioning<br />

and, moreover, rather difficult to study, on account of the obscurity of the defendants<br />

involved. <strong>The</strong> most publicized, of course, was the “Auschwitz trial” of<br />

1963-1965, and a few words are perhaps in order.<br />

This group of war crimes trials, of which the Auschwitz trial was the most<br />

prominent, was held for political reasons in the aftermath of the hysterical publicity<br />

surrounding the capture of Adolf Eichmann. One of the first victims was Richard<br />

Baer, successor to Höss and last commandant of Auschwitz, who was arrested<br />

327<br />

328<br />

Eichmann, session 72, Aal-Kk11; session 73, A1-R1; session 74, Hh1-Iil; session 88, L1-P2 and<br />

appendices; session 104, T1-V1; session 105, W1-Z1; Life (Nov. 28, 1960), 19+; (Dec. 5, 1960),<br />

146+.<br />

Eichmann, session 85, J1-K1, T1-U1; session 87, M1-O1, Y1; session 88, G1-H1.<br />

229

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!