25.01.2015 Views

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Supplement 3: A Response to a Major Critique of<br />

Holocaust Revisionism<br />

Presented orally at the 1992 conference of the Institute for Historical Review.<br />

This is a slightly edited version of the paper as published in the Journal of Historical<br />

Review, vol. 13, no. 3, May-June 1993, pp. 23-37.<br />

Why Another Critique of Jean-Claude Pressac<br />

Jean-Claude Pressac’s 1989 book, Auschwitz: Technique and Operation of the<br />

Gas Chambers, has been examined at length in <strong>The</strong> Journal of Historical Review<br />

567 and elsewhere. Pressac’s principal, almost sole targetis Robert Faurisson,<br />

and I expect that Faurisson’s critique will become the definitive one. Accordingly,<br />

this presentation is not meant to be a thorough critique of Pressac’s book.<br />

I do, however, wish to supplement what has already been written and said with<br />

some reactions of my own. What will be illustrated is something that I observed<br />

long ago and for which Pressac’s book is a wonderful example. <strong>The</strong> Holocaust is<br />

such a gigantic fraud that it is a cornucopia of absurdities. One has only to contemplate<br />

it from a slightly different perspective to see new absurdities tumble out.<br />

Alternatively, one can view it from the same perspective after some time has<br />

elapsed (or one can ask another person to observe it), with the same results.<br />

Also, Pressac has commented on my work and I think it appropriate to reply.<br />

What Pressac Has Done<br />

It is generally agreed that Pressac did history a service in gathering and publishing<br />

documents that were previously unknown or at least not easily available.<br />

He then interpreted these documents in the outlandish ways analyzed in the earlier<br />

critiques.<br />

He also accepted the chemical analyses reported by Fred Leuchter in 1988<br />

(and since confirmed by accredited chemist Germar Rudolf), 568 and the implication<br />

that the alleged mass gassings with the pesticide Zyklon did not leave cyanide<br />

traces as were left in the delousing gas chambers (although he is not entirely consistent<br />

about this). 569 Thus, he invented a gassing procedure that, he claimed without<br />

offering evidence, would leave no such trace, declared it to be the one fol-<br />

567<br />

568<br />

569<br />

Reviews and analysis of Pressac’s 1989 book that have appeared in <strong>The</strong> Journal of Historical Review:<br />

M. Weber in Vol. 10, No. 2 (Summer 1990), pp. 231-237; C. Mattogno in Vol. 10, No. 4<br />

(Winter 1990-91), pp. 461-485; R. Faurisson in Vol. 11, No. 1 (Spring 1991), pp. 25-66, and in<br />

Vol. 11, No. 2 (Summer 1991), pp. 133-175.<br />

G. Rudolf, <strong>The</strong> Rudolf Report. This report also discusses various other contributions in this matter,<br />

e.g. by the Cracow Institute for Forensic Research. Editor’s note.<br />

Pressac, p. 133.<br />

409

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!