25.01.2015 Views

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Arthur</strong> R. <strong>Butz</strong>, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Hoax</strong> of the <strong>Twentieth</strong> <strong>Century</strong><br />

Many bodies were being burned in open fires, he said, because the crematories<br />

were over-taxed.”<br />

On August 11 (page 4) is reported a letter by Horthy to the King of Sweden<br />

declaring that deportations of Jews had been stopped and that they were being allowed<br />

to leave Hungary.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are too many contradictions in the propaganda for it to equal later<br />

charges. However, the charges resemble the propaganda somewhat. <strong>The</strong> present<br />

story is that between the middle of May and sometime in early July 1944, approximately<br />

400,000 Hungarian Jews, from districts outside of the capital of Budapest,<br />

were deported by rail by the Germans and that almost all of these were<br />

killed at Birkenau, the killings having been the primary purpose of the deportations.<br />

This operation essentially cleaned out the Hungarian Jews, except for Budapest,<br />

where the Jews were left essentially intact. Even Birkenau was not designed<br />

for such large numbers of killings, so many bodies were disposed of in<br />

burning pits, and many were shot rather than gassed. 275<br />

It is obvious that no such thing could have happened, and received world-wide<br />

publicity during the war and at the later trials, without the ICRC delegation in Budapest<br />

learning of it. After all, we are speaking here of the near entirety of non-<br />

Budapest Jews, and such massive and monstrous events could not have been flippantly<br />

forgotten by the person contributing the “Hungary” section of the excerpt<br />

we have examined. <strong>The</strong> excerpt says emphatically that the major negative events<br />

effecting the Hungarian Jews occurred starting on October 1944 after Horthy’s arrest.<br />

Moreover, the Report contains the general remarks about “extermination”<br />

which we have noted, so any extermination of Hungarian Jews would, if it were a<br />

reality, definitely be mentioned in the Report. <strong>The</strong>re is clearly no truth to the<br />

claim of exterminations of Hungarian Jews.<br />

At this point it is appropriate to provide some remarks on Hungarian Jewish<br />

population in early 1944. <strong>The</strong> Nazis used a figure of about 700 or 750 thousand.<br />

276 Ruppin’s 1940 book reports that the Hungarian Jewish population rose<br />

from 440 to 480 thousand in the autumn of 1938, due to the annexation of parts of<br />

Slovakia. In the spring of 1939, the Carpatho-Ukraine was annexed so that, in<br />

June 1939, there were about 590,000 Jews in Hungary. It is known that a good<br />

number of non-Hungarian Jews, mainly Polish, took refuge in Hungary after<br />

1939, so Ruppin’s pre-war figure of 590,000 could easily have swelled to the<br />

700,000 or 750,000 figure that the Nazis used. Ruppin’s figure for Budapest’s<br />

Jewish population is 200,000 in 1930. This figure would not have been supplemented<br />

by the annexations, but it would have been supplemented to some degree<br />

during the Thirties by German and Austrian Jews and to a greater degree by Polish<br />

and other Jews after 1939. It seems reasonable to assume that there were about<br />

300,000 Jews in Budapest in the spring of 1944. Thus, we seem to have a fairly<br />

good idea of Hungarian and Budapest Jewish population in 1944. Clearly the re-<br />

275<br />

276<br />

186<br />

Reitlinger, 447-487, 540-542; Hilberg, 509-554, 599-600. Reitlinger figures some of the Hungarian<br />

Jews among the Romanians.<br />

NG-2586-G in NMT, vol. 13, 212; NO-5194, part of the Korherr report, which is reproduced in<br />

Poliakov & Wulf (1955), 240-248; NG-5620, cited by Hilberg, 513.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!