25.01.2015 Views

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> Camps and <strong>The</strong>ir End<br />

Chapter 2: <strong>The</strong> Camps<br />

<strong>The</strong> subject of this book is the question of whether or not the Germans attempted<br />

to exterminate the European Jews. We are not concerned with considering<br />

in any detail the general question of alleged Nazi brutalities of all sorts or with<br />

presenting a complete picture of the functioning of German camps. However, it<br />

has been found that many people have such distorted views of these camps that,<br />

because at Auschwitz there were camps, it is difficult to separate Auschwitz at the<br />

outset and consider it in isolation from other camps. Thus, a few general words<br />

about the camps are in order. Fig. 23 presents a map (January 1938 boundaries)<br />

that shows the locations of a few of the most frequently referred to camps together<br />

with the locations of a few large cities.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re were many types of German camps, and only a fraction of them were<br />

called “concentration camps.” <strong>The</strong>re were thirteen German concentration camps,<br />

each of them actually being a collection of neighboring camps. Only two of the<br />

six alleged “extermination camps,” Auschwitz and Lublin, were “concentration<br />

camps.” A table of many types of German camps, which includes many ordinary<br />

prisons, is given by Aronéanu, pp. 203-251, who lists about 1,400 “camps,” together<br />

with their locations and “characters.” While this table gives some idea of<br />

the scope and diversity of the German prison and camp systems, it has obvious<br />

major errors, such as giving the “character” of Birkenau as “medical experiments.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> major significance of Oranienburg, near Berlin, was that it quartered<br />

the Inspectorate of Concentration Camps, and was thus in direct communication<br />

with all concentration camps.<br />

<strong>The</strong> typical inmate of a German concentration camp was a person being detained<br />

for punitive or security reasons. <strong>The</strong>re were five major categories, and they<br />

were distinguished by colored insignia, which were associated with their uniforms:<br />

61 Table 5: Concentration camp inmate insignia<br />

COLOR CATEGORY<br />

Green Criminals<br />

Red Political prisoners (mainly communists)<br />

Pink Homosexuals<br />

Black Asocials (vagrants, drunkards, etc.)<br />

Purple Considered disloyal on account of<br />

religious views (mainly Jehovah’s Witnesses)<br />

At Auschwitz and some other camps, a triangle of the appropriate color was<br />

attached to the uniform. If the prisoner was Jewish, a yellow triangle was superimposed<br />

on the first triangle, forming a star of David. This is referred to as the<br />

Auschwitz “star system.”<br />

Economic conditions being what they were, the German government made<br />

every effort to use concentration camp inmates for labor. Prisoners of war<br />

61<br />

Cohen, 26-28.<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!