25.01.2015 Views

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Arthur</strong> R. <strong>Butz</strong>, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Hoax</strong> of the <strong>Twentieth</strong> <strong>Century</strong><br />

“We confirm receipt of your telegram specifying ‘Immediately send 10 gas<br />

detectors as agreed, price quote to follow.’<br />

We hereby inform you that two weeks ago we inquired, of five different<br />

companies, concerning the residual HCN detection devices sought by you. We<br />

have received negative responses from 3 companies and 2 have not yet answered.<br />

If [Wenn] we receive information on this matter, we shall immediately contact<br />

you, in order to put you in touch with a company that makes these devices.”<br />

Faurisson’s reply was that Zyklon B was used for delousing operations<br />

throughout the camp and of course in Crematorium II. Naturally HCN gas detectors<br />

would have been required in such operations, in which they are standard<br />

equipment. 657<br />

A Problem<br />

In both cases Faurisson gave the simple, obvious replies that I would have<br />

given under the circumstances. However, I believe this interpretation is wrong, for<br />

reasons that may be seen by examining the document. <strong>The</strong> main obstacle to interpreting<br />

this letter in terms of Zyklon B is the roles of Topf and Prüfer.<br />

Zyklon was a product of the DEGESCH company; Zyklon and associated<br />

equipment such as gas detectors and gas mask filters were also manufactured by<br />

other companies such as Tesch & Stabenow and Drägerwerke. At Auschwitz, delousing<br />

operations with Zyklon were such major and continuous tasks that there<br />

existed a special department, the Referat für Schädlingsbekämpfung (Pest Control<br />

<strong>Of</strong>fice), that conducted them. This department on occasion even communicated<br />

directly with DEGESCH. 658<br />

Topf was a furnace maker with crematorium ovens as a sideline and was the<br />

principal civilian contractor in the construction of crematoria at Auschwitz. Prüfer<br />

was the main Topf contact of the Auschwitz construction department and of<br />

course was not associated with the special SS delousing squads that regularly<br />

worked with Zyklon B. Why should Prüfer have been searching, indeed with great<br />

difficulty, for devices that were standard equipment for the delousing squads and<br />

were readily available from the DEGESCH and other companies, which had developed<br />

and supplied Zyklon <strong>The</strong> standard DEGESCH detector for HCN required<br />

exposing a test paper and observing the color assumed. <strong>The</strong> Prüfer letter<br />

even implies that he does not know whether the desired devices exist, was confronting<br />

this specific need for the first time, and does not know very much about<br />

it, inferences that are very important in interpreting the letter. I do not believe the<br />

letter had anything to do with Zyklon.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re may however have been one connection between Topf and Zyklon.<br />

657<br />

658<br />

434<br />

R. Faurisson, “Jean-Claude Pressac’s New Auschwitz Book,” Journal of Historical Review, vol.<br />

14, no. 1, Jan./Feb. 1994, p. 23.<br />

Raul Hilberg, <strong>The</strong> Destruction of the European Jews, p. 571 in the 1961 Quadrangle edition; vol.<br />

3, p. 892 in the 1985 Holmes & Meier edition. Hilberg cites a letter from the Referat to DE-<br />

GESCH.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!