25.01.2015 Views

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Arthur</strong> R. <strong>Butz</strong>, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Hoax</strong> of the <strong>Twentieth</strong> <strong>Century</strong><br />

ported on his strenuous subsequent efforts to contact Nyiszli and determine<br />

whether or not he actually existed; the only person who seemed unquestionably to<br />

exist was translator Kremer. 230 An English translation of Richard Seaver, foreword<br />

by Bruno Bettelheim, was published in New York in 1960 under the title<br />

Auschwitz. Nyiszli was obviously dead by then because it is specified that the<br />

copyright is held by “N. Margareta Nyiszli.” As is the usual practice with deceased<br />

authors who held doctor’s degrees, the title page of a doctoral thesis, by<br />

“Nicolaus Nyiszli,” Breslau 1930, is reproduced in the 1960 NY edition. <strong>The</strong><br />

book was republished in French and German editions in 1961.<br />

According to Rassinier, it is difficult enough to reconcile the numbers in the<br />

various editions, but it is not even possible to get internal consistency in one edition.<br />

In the 1960 edition we read (page 55) that the 60 muffles could reduce “several<br />

thousand” corpses per day. Further on (page 87) we are told that “when the<br />

two (burning pits) were operating simultaneously, their output varied from five to<br />

six thousand dead a day, slightly better than the crematoriums,” but then later on<br />

(page 92) we learn that Crematories II and III could alone dispose of at least<br />

10,500 per day. This is total confusion.<br />

<strong>The</strong> writings attributed to Nyiszli also commit what I consider the basic witness-disqualifying<br />

act; they claim gratuitous regular beatings of initially healthy<br />

prisoners by the SS (e.g. pp. 25, 27, 44, 57); it is known that this was not the case.<br />

Aside from possible humanitarian objections to such beatings, the prisoners were<br />

a source of income to the SS. Many were the complaints, on the part of the SS,<br />

against various forms of alleged Farben mistreatment. On the other hand, for security<br />

reasons, the SS discouraged fraternization between guards and prisoners.<br />

<strong>The</strong> SS guard was ordered to maintain “distance” (Abstand) from the prisoners,<br />

not even talking to them unless absolutely necessary. This regulation was of<br />

course difficult to enforce and the regular and very frequent infringements of it<br />

produced memoranda from Pohl to the camp commanders ordering appropriate<br />

and systematic instruction of the guards. 231<br />

Despite a certain amount of SS guard brutality as reported by authors of other<br />

books, Cohen does not report such experiences at Auschwitz and remarks that the<br />

“reception ceremony” for his transport “passed without violence.” However, he<br />

mentions a specially constructed wooden table used for beating prisoners on the<br />

buttocks. This was a formerly regulated mode of punishment of prisoners who<br />

committed various offenses in the camps; “intensified” beating was defined as<br />

whacking on the naked buttocks. 232<br />

When an Auschwitz witness starts claiming regular gratuitous beating, he may<br />

be telling the truth on some matters, but one must reject his general credibility.<br />

On the basis of the available evidence, the best assumption is that there were<br />

30 muffles available at Birkenau in the spring of 1943, and 46 a year later. Before<br />

leaving the subject of the number of muffles, we should remark that there are certain<br />

ambiguities in the documents relating to the crematories. <strong>The</strong> most obvious is<br />

230<br />

231<br />

232<br />

150<br />

Rassinier (1962), 245-249.<br />

DuBois, 221. NO-1245.<br />

Cohen, 81, 125. See also Fyfe, 159, and Appendix D here.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!