25.01.2015 Views

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3: Washington and New York<br />

Early in 1942 it became realized that, if there was to be any American war effort,<br />

a gigantic synthetic rubber industry would have to be created in record time. <strong>The</strong><br />

apparently dismal prospects for such an achievement were the cause of some<br />

amount of panic, and naturally, scapegoats were sought. Jesse Jones was a favorite<br />

target, and his claim that 300,000 tons of synthetic rubber would be produced<br />

in 1943 and 600,000 tons in 1944 was jeered at (U.S. rubber consumption in 1940<br />

was 648,500 tons). Standard Oil also came in for outrageously unfair abuse by<br />

people who interpreted the Farben-Standard agreements as a conspiracy to retard<br />

synthetic rubber development in the U.S. Harry S. Truman, chairman of a Senate<br />

committee, which investigated war production problems, first became prominent<br />

in connection with the rubber crisis of 1942.<br />

<strong>The</strong> crisis also set off internal political conflicts. <strong>The</strong> big oil interests had a<br />

long lead in the production of Buna-S, but the farm bloc was dominant in Congress.<br />

Now, Buna can be made not only from coal and oil, but also from alcohol,<br />

an agricultural product. Foreseeing the birth of a major new industry, the farm interests<br />

started arguing in favor of making Buna from alcohol (the most expensive<br />

method). <strong>The</strong>y cited the fact that the Russians, also long active in the synthetic<br />

rubber field, started from alcohol. <strong>The</strong>y also produced a Polish refugee who was<br />

supposed to have made some revolutionary invention in connection with making<br />

Buna from alcohol.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re was another political bloc tied up with South American interests, which<br />

proposed subsidies for plantations. <strong>The</strong>re was also a small farm bloc which<br />

pressed for more extensive planting of the guayule plant in the southwest. <strong>The</strong> effect<br />

of these internal political battles was to generate massive confusion and retard<br />

the progress of the existing U.S. Buna program.<br />

<strong>The</strong> rubber crisis filled the press in 1942 and was, in fact, the major crisis the<br />

U.S. faced in connection with the war. <strong>The</strong>re was constant lamenting that Germany<br />

was well ahead of the U.S. and that the U.S. lacked the vital experience<br />

with the processes that the Germans possessed. Methods being used in Germany<br />

were cited in connection with discussing the prospects of the U.S. program. 119<br />

<strong>The</strong> farm bloc’s battle against what it called the “oily interests” achieved a<br />

temporary major success in July 1942, when the Congress passed the weird “Rubber<br />

Supply Act of 1942.” <strong>The</strong> Act would have established a new agency for rubber<br />

production, entirely under the control of Congress and outside the domain of<br />

the War Production Board, the Army, the Navy, or any executive agency of the<br />

Government. <strong>Of</strong> course, the Act also specified that the rubber was to be made<br />

from grain alcohol. President Roosevelt vetoed this bill on August 6 and announced<br />

the appointment of a committee to study the rubber problem and make<br />

some recommendations in regard to the organization of an American synthetic<br />

119<br />

As stated, the rubber crisis “filled the press,” but the following stories seem to summarize the crisis<br />

adequately: Business Week (Jan. 31, 1942), 22+; (Mar. 14, 1942), 15+; (May 30, 1942), 15+;<br />

(Jun. 20, 1942), 15+; (Aug. 15, 1942), 15+; (Sep. 19, 1942), 15+; (Dec. 19, 1942), 28+; Newsweek<br />

(Apr. 6, 1942), 46+; (Apr. 13, 1942), 56+; (June 1, 1942), 46+; (Sep. 21, 1942), 58+; New<br />

York Times (Jan. 11, 1942), sec. 7, 6+; (Jul. 26, 1942), sec. 7, 3+; Fortune (June 1942), 92+; Nature<br />

Magazine (May 1942), 233+; Harper’s (Dec. 1942), 66+.<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!