25.01.2015 Views

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

Arthur R. Butz – The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Arthur</strong> R. <strong>Butz</strong>, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Hoax</strong> of the <strong>Twentieth</strong> <strong>Century</strong><br />

Before leaving Cohen, we should note that there were sick emaciated Jews, as<br />

well as others, in the Auschwitz I hospital. He further informs us: 211<br />

“[…] <strong>The</strong> HKB was housed in five good stone-built blocks. <strong>The</strong>re was one<br />

block for surgery, one for infectious diseases, one for internal diseases, one<br />

for ‘Schonung’ (less serious cases) and Block 28 (X-ray, specialists’ rooms,<br />

medical experiments, admissions). <strong>The</strong> sick lay in three bunks, one above another,<br />

on straw mattresses, and were dressed in a shirt (with, later, a pair of<br />

drawers added), under two cotton blankets and a sheet. Every week the patients<br />

were bathed, and every two weeks they were given ‘clean’ underwear<br />

and a ‘clean’ sheet; there were few fleas and no lice. Each berth was seldom<br />

occupied by more than two persons. But […] even patients in a state of high<br />

fever had to leave their beds to go to the toilet or to wash in the cold lavatory<br />

in the mornings. Because of ‘organizations’ from the SS, there were always<br />

medicines, though not in sufficient quantities, including even sulfa drugs; these<br />

had been brought in by large transports of Jews from every European country.”<br />

He adds that hospital conditions were much worse in other camps (about<br />

which he has only read).<br />

<strong>The</strong> Auschwitz I hospital was obviously no luxury establishment but nevertheless<br />

it showed a serious concern, on the part of the Germans, for the recovery<br />

of inmates, including Jews, who had fallen ill. This observation also opposes the<br />

claim that those not fit for work were killed. Cohen reports certain selections of an<br />

incompletely known character, in connection with unknown destinations. It may<br />

be that those considered of no further use as labor were sent to Birkenau; this<br />

would be very reasonable because it has been shown that the unemployables from<br />

the Monowitz hospital were sent to Birkenau.<br />

“Special Treatment”<br />

<strong>The</strong> term “special treatment,” Sonderbehandlung, is supposed to have been<br />

one of the code words for gassing. When it is said that N Jews in a transport to<br />

Auschwitz were gassed, and that this is according to some German record or<br />

document, it is the case that the word “Sonderbehandlung” is being interpreted as<br />

meaning gassing. <strong>The</strong> documents in question are two in number, and are printed<br />

(not reproduced from originals) in a 1946 publication of the Polish government.<br />

Both documents are said to be signed by an SS Lieutenant Schwarz. <strong>The</strong>y state<br />

that from several Jewish transports from Breslau and Berlin to Auschwitz in<br />

March 1943, a certain fraction of Jews were selected for labor, and that the remainder<br />

were sonderbehandelt. As far as I know, these documents are not Nuremberg<br />

documents; the originals, if they exist (which I am not denying), are in<br />

Polish archives. 212<br />

211<br />

212<br />

144<br />

Cohen, 60.<br />

Friedman, 14-15; Reitlinger, 172; Hilberg, 587; Blumental, 109-110. One of the documents are

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!