08.04.2015 Views

Business Case for the SunShine CoaSt airport Master Plan

Business Case for the SunShine CoaSt airport Master Plan

Business Case for the SunShine CoaSt airport Master Plan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Note: sample years have been provided <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> purposes of <strong>the</strong> summary contained in this schedule. A full time series of benefits and costs, including NPVs <strong>for</strong><br />

each category (at <strong>the</strong> 7% discount rate) is provided within <strong>the</strong> PwC report at Appendix D.<br />

All outputs <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> CBA have been calculated using an incremental approach. Only <strong>the</strong> additional costs, revenues and benefits associated with <strong>the</strong> <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

are reported in <strong>the</strong> option case. A base case was considered <strong>for</strong> cost/benefit categories that were not easily separated from overall <strong>airport</strong> costs/benefits to<br />

ensure that all expected costs, revenues and benefits associated with <strong>the</strong> continuation of current <strong>airport</strong> operations (i.e. <strong>the</strong> base case scenario) are excluded,<br />

however this does not represent a full base case <strong>for</strong> comparative purposes.<br />

There is no plausible do nothing scenario <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sunshine Coast Airport; all planning assumes that future growth in passenger numbers will occur, and <strong>airport</strong><br />

operations will continue to service this growth. Options such as <strong>the</strong> total relocation of <strong>the</strong> current <strong>airport</strong> to an alternative site were considered as part of <strong>the</strong><br />

preliminary planning and investigations <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> current <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>, and dismissed as impractical or cost-ineffective. ‘Base <strong>Case</strong>’ benefits are <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e<br />

reported as zero.<br />

Base <strong>Case</strong> Option<br />

2021 2030 2040 2021 2030 2040<br />

Incremental RPT revenues - - - $2.8m $8.8m $17.1m<br />

Incremental returns from SCA precincts - - - - $4.2m $8.4m<br />

1 | P a g e<br />

Detailed Monetised Benefits<br />

($m, real, undiscounted)<br />

This approach is considered to be most appropriate to <strong>the</strong> objective of assessing <strong>the</strong> net benefit of <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!