Programme full
Programme full
Programme full
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Wednesday 15 April 2015 11:00 - 12:30<br />
PAPER SESSION 2<br />
dismantle the normative. Do qualitative feminist sociological methodologies need to develop new approaches,<br />
perhaps drawing on indigenous research methods for example, or can existing approaches be adapted?<br />
Visual Reflections<br />
Guest, C.<br />
(Birkbeck, University of London)<br />
This paper draws on narrative interviews exploring women's accounts of 'becoming feminist'. Interviewees were asked<br />
to present and discuss images that held significance to their feminism. The use of visual methods provides exciting<br />
and interesting data, however this paper will focus on how it is also an effective, yet challenging reflexive social<br />
research tool. Taking specific examples from the interviews it will discuss three aspects of visual methods as a<br />
reflexive, ethical and political research tool.<br />
Firstly, it will discuss issues of mis-identification and appropriation – what does it reveal about the researcher and her<br />
relationship to the data when images are viewed as her own? Can these moments of viewing act as prompts to reflect<br />
on the pre-conceptions and investments that the researcher brings to the research process?<br />
Secondly, it asks how the use of the visual in an interview can produce non-linguistic narratives that often complicate<br />
or contradict spoken narratives. In doing so it can highlight what is difficult to articulate verbally and bring to the fore<br />
the affective dimension of the interview.<br />
Finally, it explores the significance and complexities of giving consent for the use of visual images in research. It asks<br />
what might be revealed in the images interviewees choose to display or hide. It reflects on an instance where an<br />
interviewee consented to the reproduction of an that produced unease and discomfort in the researcher. This final<br />
section explores the ways in which ethical research practice unfolds and develops across the research process.<br />
‘Dear Researcher’ Revisited: Methodological Reflections on Data Collection Via E(mail)<br />
Letherby, G., Parsons, J.<br />
(Plymouth University)<br />
Here we reflect on our individual and joint experience of data collection via (e)mail. When Gayle began fieldwork for<br />
her doctorate (on the experience of 'infertility' and 'involuntary childlessness' (in single quotation marks to highlight<br />
problems of definition)) in the early 1990s she expected data to be collected only through face-to-face interviews. The<br />
100+ letters she received from more than 50 women and eight men and the significance of these both<br />
methodologically and substantively were a surprise. Julie on the other hand embarked on her doctoral data collection<br />
in 2010, for her auto/biographical study of relationships with food, intending to correspond (via email) with respondents<br />
through a series of asynchronous on-line interviews. She collected narratives from 75 individuals, some of whom drew<br />
on epistolary traditions associated with letter writing whilst others engaged in emerging forms of expression,<br />
emoticons etc. Recently, working together, we have continued this approach for a project concerned with weight loss<br />
management, including weight loss surgery, again collecting data via asynchronous online interviews with 62<br />
respondents. Here, with specific reference to our separate and collaborative work, we reflect on the use and meanings<br />
of 'research by correspondence'. We revisit the arguments put forward by Gayle and a colleague (Letherby and<br />
Zdodrowski 1995) arguing for the academic and political value of such an approach and reflect on the benefits and<br />
costs of e(mail) data collection.<br />
Letherby. G. and Zdrokowski, D. (1995) 'Dear Researcher: the use of correspondence as a method within feminist<br />
qualitative research' Gender and Society 9:5<br />
Race, Ethnicity and Migration 1<br />
CARNEGIE LECTURE THEATRE, CHARLES OAKLEY BUILDING<br />
RACISM, CLASS AND THE RACIALIZED OUTSIDER: A ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION WITH PROFESSORS<br />
SATNAM VIRDEE, GARGI BHATTACHARYA, JOHN SOLOMOS AND TIM STRANGLEMAN<br />
Racism, Class and the Racialized Outsider offers a critical analysis of working class efforts to secure economic and<br />
social justice and democratize British (Scottish and English) society over the longue duree (covering a two hundred<br />
year period between 1780 and 1990). Unlike most studies of the British working class however, it investigates these<br />
social and political struggles through ‘the prism of race’. As a result, it offers an original perspective on the significance<br />
of both racism and anti-racism in the making of the working class. While racism became a powerful structuring force<br />
BSA Annual Conference 2015 98<br />
Glasgow Caledonian University