09.04.2015 Views

Programme full

Programme full

Programme full

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Wednesday 15 April 2015 11:00 - 12:30<br />

PAPER SESSION 2<br />

dismantle the normative. Do qualitative feminist sociological methodologies need to develop new approaches,<br />

perhaps drawing on indigenous research methods for example, or can existing approaches be adapted?<br />

Visual Reflections<br />

Guest, C.<br />

(Birkbeck, University of London)<br />

This paper draws on narrative interviews exploring women's accounts of 'becoming feminist'. Interviewees were asked<br />

to present and discuss images that held significance to their feminism. The use of visual methods provides exciting<br />

and interesting data, however this paper will focus on how it is also an effective, yet challenging reflexive social<br />

research tool. Taking specific examples from the interviews it will discuss three aspects of visual methods as a<br />

reflexive, ethical and political research tool.<br />

Firstly, it will discuss issues of mis-identification and appropriation – what does it reveal about the researcher and her<br />

relationship to the data when images are viewed as her own? Can these moments of viewing act as prompts to reflect<br />

on the pre-conceptions and investments that the researcher brings to the research process?<br />

Secondly, it asks how the use of the visual in an interview can produce non-linguistic narratives that often complicate<br />

or contradict spoken narratives. In doing so it can highlight what is difficult to articulate verbally and bring to the fore<br />

the affective dimension of the interview.<br />

Finally, it explores the significance and complexities of giving consent for the use of visual images in research. It asks<br />

what might be revealed in the images interviewees choose to display or hide. It reflects on an instance where an<br />

interviewee consented to the reproduction of an that produced unease and discomfort in the researcher. This final<br />

section explores the ways in which ethical research practice unfolds and develops across the research process.<br />

‘Dear Researcher’ Revisited: Methodological Reflections on Data Collection Via E(mail)<br />

Letherby, G., Parsons, J.<br />

(Plymouth University)<br />

Here we reflect on our individual and joint experience of data collection via (e)mail. When Gayle began fieldwork for<br />

her doctorate (on the experience of 'infertility' and 'involuntary childlessness' (in single quotation marks to highlight<br />

problems of definition)) in the early 1990s she expected data to be collected only through face-to-face interviews. The<br />

100+ letters she received from more than 50 women and eight men and the significance of these both<br />

methodologically and substantively were a surprise. Julie on the other hand embarked on her doctoral data collection<br />

in 2010, for her auto/biographical study of relationships with food, intending to correspond (via email) with respondents<br />

through a series of asynchronous on-line interviews. She collected narratives from 75 individuals, some of whom drew<br />

on epistolary traditions associated with letter writing whilst others engaged in emerging forms of expression,<br />

emoticons etc. Recently, working together, we have continued this approach for a project concerned with weight loss<br />

management, including weight loss surgery, again collecting data via asynchronous online interviews with 62<br />

respondents. Here, with specific reference to our separate and collaborative work, we reflect on the use and meanings<br />

of 'research by correspondence'. We revisit the arguments put forward by Gayle and a colleague (Letherby and<br />

Zdodrowski 1995) arguing for the academic and political value of such an approach and reflect on the benefits and<br />

costs of e(mail) data collection.<br />

Letherby. G. and Zdrokowski, D. (1995) 'Dear Researcher: the use of correspondence as a method within feminist<br />

qualitative research' Gender and Society 9:5<br />

Race, Ethnicity and Migration 1<br />

CARNEGIE LECTURE THEATRE, CHARLES OAKLEY BUILDING<br />

RACISM, CLASS AND THE RACIALIZED OUTSIDER: A ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION WITH PROFESSORS<br />

SATNAM VIRDEE, GARGI BHATTACHARYA, JOHN SOLOMOS AND TIM STRANGLEMAN<br />

Racism, Class and the Racialized Outsider offers a critical analysis of working class efforts to secure economic and<br />

social justice and democratize British (Scottish and English) society over the longue duree (covering a two hundred<br />

year period between 1780 and 1990). Unlike most studies of the British working class however, it investigates these<br />

social and political struggles through ‘the prism of race’. As a result, it offers an original perspective on the significance<br />

of both racism and anti-racism in the making of the working class. While racism became a powerful structuring force<br />

BSA Annual Conference 2015 98<br />

Glasgow Caledonian University

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!