09.04.2015 Views

Programme full

Programme full

Programme full

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Friday 17 April 2015 15:15 - 16:45<br />

PAPER SESSION 8<br />

identities and psychic suffering amongst Portuguese workers. Through the analysis of biographic interviews to present<br />

and former call and contact centre workers, it aims at analyzing the work experiences and life working conditions<br />

reported by the teleoperators. It was concluded that they live in a constant state of emotional fear and psychosocial<br />

risk as a result of the flexible, repetitive and controlled work implemented at the telecommunications assembly lines. It<br />

creates an eminent fear and mind blockage that stops them from being ambitious in life by giving up their dreams of a<br />

family, of fulfilling their occupational identities and achieving mental and physical harmony. In most cases, some of<br />

these young adults remain adult children by never emancipating from their parents and from their precarious jobs.<br />

Work, Employment and Economic Life 2<br />

W823, HAMISH WOOD BUILDING<br />

Foundations of the Workfare State: Reflections on the Political Transformation of the Welfare State in Britain<br />

Deeming, C.<br />

(University of Bristol)<br />

The British 'welfare state' has been transformed. 'Welfare' has been replaced by a new 'workfare' regime (the 'Work<br />

<strong>Programme</strong>') defined by tougher state regulatory practices for those receiving out-of-work benefits. US-style<br />

mandatory community work programmes are being revived and expanded. This article, therefore, considers shifting<br />

public attitudes to work and welfare in Britain and changing attitudes to working-age welfare and out-of-work benefits<br />

in particular. It also<br />

considers the extent to which recent transformations of the state may be explained by declines in traditional labourist<br />

politics and class-based solidarity. Thus, we attempt to develop a richer understanding of changing public attitudes<br />

towards welfare and the punitive regulatory 'workfare' practices engaged by the modern state in the liberal market<br />

economy; reflecting on the nature of the relations between ideology, party policies, popular attitudes and their political<br />

impact.<br />

Long-term Care and Labour Market Performance of Welfare Recipients in Germany<br />

Kopf, E., Hohmeyer, K.<br />

(Institute for Employment Research)<br />

Due to the demographic development, the demand for long-term care is increasing in the near future in many<br />

developed countries. Furthermore in response to these demographic changes, the OECD advised member countries<br />

to take measures to increase employment to ensure the sustainability of the welfare state. Since the welfare reforms<br />

in Germany, welfare recipients were supposed to be ready to work and help themselves to decrease or end the<br />

neediness of their household. However, 7% of the members of these households who receive welfare benefits are<br />

engaged in long-term care of relatives or friends in need of assistance. Their care tasks may interfere with their job<br />

search.<br />

Our paper studies the relationship between care tasks of welfare recipients and their labour market performance. The<br />

direction of this relationship is not clear: on the one hand, taking care of relatives can worsen labour market<br />

opportunities. On the other hand, taking care of relatives can be the result of bad labour market opportunities (see<br />

Heitmüller, 2007; Meng, 2013). To shed light on this relationship, we study the labour market performance of welfare<br />

recipients taking care of relatives. Our analyses are based on survey data from the Panel Study Labour Market and<br />

Social Security and on panel methods.<br />

Financial Literacy and Welfare: Transforming Income into Living Standard<br />

Beste, J., Bethmann, A.<br />

(University of Mannheim)<br />

One of the basic distinctions in the measurement of welfare is between indirect and direct approaches. A resource<br />

based measure like income can be considered an indirect approach, as it only accounts for the means necessary to<br />

produce welfare in a subsequent step. The standard of living approach on the other hand provides a direct way of<br />

measuring welfare. It accounts for goods, services, and activities available to the household members and might<br />

therefore resemble the actual living conditions more closely.<br />

Conceptually it can be assumed that living standard is generated primarily from available income. However, in reality<br />

similar income does not always lead to a comparable living standard. Factors like individual preferences, debts and<br />

assets, support networks, household composition and regional differences are likely to affect the transforming.<br />

BSA Annual Conference 2015 308<br />

Glasgow Caledonian University

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!