09.04.2015 Views

Programme full

Programme full

Programme full

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Frontiers<br />

W308, HAMISH WOOD BUILDING<br />

Wednesday 15 April 2015 09:00 - 10:30<br />

PAPER SESSION 1<br />

Fragile Identifications in a Fantasmatic Present: the Social and Psychical Function of Temporality in the<br />

Practice of Academic Research<br />

Lapping, C.<br />

(Institute of Education, University of London)<br />

This performative paper explores some of the spatialities embedded in the thinking and practice of psychoanalyticallyinformed<br />

clinical work. I reflect on the subjective use I make of journeys to and from the settings in which I practice, as<br />

well as the micro-geographies that take place within these settings. In so doing I seek to communicate something of<br />

the sense of interior worlds created by and necessary for therapeutic work. My account gestures towards the spatial<br />

ideas that permeate psychoanalytic, which I and suggest sometimes operate as a common language shared across<br />

different theoretical positions.<br />

A Personal Geography of Psychodynamic Practice<br />

Bondi, L.<br />

(University of Edinburgh)<br />

This performative paper explores some of the spatialities embedded in the thinking and practice of psychoanalyticallyinformed<br />

clinical work. I reflect on the subjective use I make of journeys to and from the settings in which I practice, as<br />

well as the micro-geographies that take place within these settings. In so doing I seek to communicate something of<br />

the sense of interior worlds created by and necessary for therapeutic work. My account gestures towards the spatial<br />

ideas that permeate psychoanalytic, which I and suggest sometimes operate as a common language shared across<br />

different theoretical positions.<br />

The Psycho-social Orders of Supervision : Ignorance and Ignominy<br />

Webb, R., Hey, V.<br />

(University of Sussex)<br />

If learning is about the acquisition of new knowledge, it implicates the state of a 'before of ignorance' and an 'after of<br />

enlightenment'. How do differently positioned academic subjects negotiate the affective dimensions at play in such<br />

transactions?<br />

In this paper Rebecca Webb and her 'ex' supervisor, Valerie Hey, draw on their empirical accounts of supervision,<br />

sharing some of the writing they have generated as part of their supervisory sessions together. They do this in order<br />

to think through the affects of shame in the shaping and honing of different kinds of subjecthood, rendered im/possible<br />

in their encounters. Indeed, they explore shame as something which is inherently unstable and yet potentially<br />

productive and affirming, born out of the opacity and tantalizing quality of writing itself.<br />

What is at stake in shame in the encounter, especially as it frames the mimetic quality of engaging with writing in a<br />

supervisor/supervisee relationship? Is shame that which must be 'avoided' at all costs, something damaging and<br />

eroding of any worthwhile sense of self? Does this mean that it must be named (and shamed) at the outset and swept<br />

away with a deft swish of a supervisory broom? Or, rather, is it that which must be countenanced and acknowledged<br />

in the processes of subjectification (Butler, 1995) and is that particular affect constitutive of an emergence of a<br />

'getting to know' in any supervisory relationship worth its salt?<br />

Shame and Welfare Practice: A Relational Analysis<br />

Dobson, R.<br />

(Kingston University)<br />

This presentation draws on psycho-social, critical race and feminist informed theorisations of shame, and empirical<br />

data from social housing and homelessness workers, to contribute to a lineage of research on 'front-line' welfare<br />

practitioners and welfare practices in social policy and welfare. Within sociological and policy debates, and in contexts<br />

of 'austerity', welfare practitioners are typically positioned in binary terms: constructed as good, benevolent and heroic<br />

resisters to, or as exercising bad, malevolent and inadequate complicities with, punitive policy, political and popular<br />

climates. Critical psycho-social works have engaged with those debates through the analysis of relationships between<br />

'dilemmatic' experience, human subjectivity and institutional space (Hoggett 2001, 2006). This presentation builds on<br />

those vital intellectual interventions by drawing on relational and performative informed conceptualisations of shame<br />

65 BSA Annual Conference 2015<br />

Glasgow Caledonian University

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!