Programme full
Programme full
Programme full
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Frontiers<br />
W308, HAMISH WOOD BUILDING<br />
Wednesday 15 April 2015 09:00 - 10:30<br />
PAPER SESSION 1<br />
Fragile Identifications in a Fantasmatic Present: the Social and Psychical Function of Temporality in the<br />
Practice of Academic Research<br />
Lapping, C.<br />
(Institute of Education, University of London)<br />
This performative paper explores some of the spatialities embedded in the thinking and practice of psychoanalyticallyinformed<br />
clinical work. I reflect on the subjective use I make of journeys to and from the settings in which I practice, as<br />
well as the micro-geographies that take place within these settings. In so doing I seek to communicate something of<br />
the sense of interior worlds created by and necessary for therapeutic work. My account gestures towards the spatial<br />
ideas that permeate psychoanalytic, which I and suggest sometimes operate as a common language shared across<br />
different theoretical positions.<br />
A Personal Geography of Psychodynamic Practice<br />
Bondi, L.<br />
(University of Edinburgh)<br />
This performative paper explores some of the spatialities embedded in the thinking and practice of psychoanalyticallyinformed<br />
clinical work. I reflect on the subjective use I make of journeys to and from the settings in which I practice, as<br />
well as the micro-geographies that take place within these settings. In so doing I seek to communicate something of<br />
the sense of interior worlds created by and necessary for therapeutic work. My account gestures towards the spatial<br />
ideas that permeate psychoanalytic, which I and suggest sometimes operate as a common language shared across<br />
different theoretical positions.<br />
The Psycho-social Orders of Supervision : Ignorance and Ignominy<br />
Webb, R., Hey, V.<br />
(University of Sussex)<br />
If learning is about the acquisition of new knowledge, it implicates the state of a 'before of ignorance' and an 'after of<br />
enlightenment'. How do differently positioned academic subjects negotiate the affective dimensions at play in such<br />
transactions?<br />
In this paper Rebecca Webb and her 'ex' supervisor, Valerie Hey, draw on their empirical accounts of supervision,<br />
sharing some of the writing they have generated as part of their supervisory sessions together. They do this in order<br />
to think through the affects of shame in the shaping and honing of different kinds of subjecthood, rendered im/possible<br />
in their encounters. Indeed, they explore shame as something which is inherently unstable and yet potentially<br />
productive and affirming, born out of the opacity and tantalizing quality of writing itself.<br />
What is at stake in shame in the encounter, especially as it frames the mimetic quality of engaging with writing in a<br />
supervisor/supervisee relationship? Is shame that which must be 'avoided' at all costs, something damaging and<br />
eroding of any worthwhile sense of self? Does this mean that it must be named (and shamed) at the outset and swept<br />
away with a deft swish of a supervisory broom? Or, rather, is it that which must be countenanced and acknowledged<br />
in the processes of subjectification (Butler, 1995) and is that particular affect constitutive of an emergence of a<br />
'getting to know' in any supervisory relationship worth its salt?<br />
Shame and Welfare Practice: A Relational Analysis<br />
Dobson, R.<br />
(Kingston University)<br />
This presentation draws on psycho-social, critical race and feminist informed theorisations of shame, and empirical<br />
data from social housing and homelessness workers, to contribute to a lineage of research on 'front-line' welfare<br />
practitioners and welfare practices in social policy and welfare. Within sociological and policy debates, and in contexts<br />
of 'austerity', welfare practitioners are typically positioned in binary terms: constructed as good, benevolent and heroic<br />
resisters to, or as exercising bad, malevolent and inadequate complicities with, punitive policy, political and popular<br />
climates. Critical psycho-social works have engaged with those debates through the analysis of relationships between<br />
'dilemmatic' experience, human subjectivity and institutional space (Hoggett 2001, 2006). This presentation builds on<br />
those vital intellectual interventions by drawing on relational and performative informed conceptualisations of shame<br />
65 BSA Annual Conference 2015<br />
Glasgow Caledonian University