09.04.2015 Views

Programme full

Programme full

Programme full

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Occupy in Space: Making Nonsense Appear<br />

Burgum, S.<br />

(University of Warwick)<br />

Thursday 16 April 2016 15:30 - 17:00<br />

PAPER SESSION 6 / PECHA KUCHA SESSIONS<br />

In what ways have post-crash resistances to neoliberal capitalism been limited through a foreclosure of possibilities<br />

and did Occupy (in) London manage to challenge that foreclosure through their novel approach to resistance?<br />

As the name of the movement suggests, the eponymous tactic of Occupy was the semi-permanent occupation of<br />

space, which in practice involved the setting up of various camps, squats and meeting places in urban centres. In<br />

London, this took the form of the infamous camp outside St Paul's cathedral, a camp at Finsbury Square in Islington,<br />

and a 'nomad' group (who, in 2012, were camping at Mile End in Tower Hamlets), as well as a number of squatted<br />

buildings.<br />

Using the ideas of Jacques Ranciere, I argue that this semi-permanent occupation of public offline space ultimately<br />

allowed Occupy to enforce the appearance of a 'nonsensical' position (that there could be an alternative to reestablishing<br />

neoliberalism after the crash). Notwithstanding other problems with the movement, therefore, I suggest<br />

that the occupation of space in-itself has the potential to be an effective tactic in challenging the hegemonic<br />

'distribution of the sensible', allowing for the material appearance of (politically proper) dissensus. In other words,<br />

precisely by occupying spaces where they are 'not supposed' to appear, occupy-type movements are able to<br />

challenge the prevailing designation of their resistance as 'non-sense'.<br />

This paper is based upon three years of research with Occupy (in) London, including interviews and ethnographic data<br />

Cities, Mobilities, Place and Space 2<br />

W702, HAMISH WOOD BUILDING<br />

The Residualisation of UK Local Government? The Impact of Austerity in Local Government on Deprived<br />

People and Places<br />

Hastings, A., Bailey, N., Bramley, G., Gannon, M.<br />

(University of Glasgow)<br />

Local government is one of the foremost casualties of the fiscal austerity which has characterised UK public policy<br />

since 2010. There is particular concern that the cuts impact disproportionately on the most deprived cities and<br />

authorities. However, much of the early research on the impact of fiscal austerity suggested that local councils had<br />

largely been able to absorb budgetary pressures through service redesign, job losses and other 'efficiency' savings,<br />

and that the impact on services and service users has been more limited than might have been expected.<br />

This paper brings together a range of quantitative and qualitative evidence from the final stage of a major project for<br />

the Joseph Rowntree Foundation designed to explore whether and how councils would be able to meet the needs of<br />

more disadvantaged people and places in the face of unprecedented austerity. The paper triangulates detailed<br />

analysis of the high level decisions made by four case study councils to balance budgets with the rich evidence<br />

documenting the experiences of 'front line' council staff and service users of the impact of these decisions. The<br />

findings challenge the conventional wisdom that austerity has not impacted significantly on the quantity and quality of<br />

council services. It identifies a range of mechanisms which – despite intentions of strategic decision makers to the<br />

contrary – visit some of the severest impacts of budget cuts on the poorest and most vulnerable service users. It<br />

argues that this is an inevitable consequence of the residualisation of local government brought about by austerity.<br />

'Commitment to Place, Precarity and the Threat to Social Housing Security Posed by the 'Bedroom Tax': A<br />

Case Study of a Midlands Estate'<br />

Bogue, K.<br />

(University of Manchester)<br />

The Welfare Reform Act 2012 introduced the 'removal of the spare room subsidy' from April 2013 commonly referred<br />

to as the 'bedroom tax'. My qualitative doctoral research by a resident researcher sought to understand the <strong>full</strong> effects<br />

of this policy on vulnerable residents on one predominantly white working class housing estate, adopting a holistic<br />

approach that utilises biographical and ethnographic methods.<br />

Emerging findings indicate that social housing tenants face stark and extremely stressful choices about leaving their<br />

homes to avoid paying the increased rent, such 'choices' often limited due to the unavailability of smaller properties<br />

199 BSA Annual Conference 2015<br />

Glasgow Caledonian University

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!