Programme full
Programme full
Programme full
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Friday 17 April 2015 15:15 - 16:45<br />
PAPER SESSION 8<br />
community as the basis for health promotion and the emergence of collective, digitally-organised HIV testing, and; the<br />
importance of technologies for the social capital of people facing elevated risk for sexually transmitted infections. Key<br />
themes of this panel will include how individuals, couples, networks and collectivities negotiate changing expectations<br />
regarding the role of digital and medical technologies in sexual intimacy, relational possibilities, and elective<br />
community, among other matters. The panel therefore addresses transition in one key domain of public policy<br />
articulated into intimate lifeworlds, revealing how technologies of sexual health are addressed, appropriated,<br />
reinvented and resisted by its subjects.<br />
The panel is linked with another which addresses new narrative technologies of intimacy in relation to gender,<br />
sexuality and parenting.<br />
Intimate Technologies and Reflexive Sexual Health: Self-risk Assessment and Self-testing<br />
Flowers, P., Ahmed, B., Park, C., Young, I., Frankis, J., Davis, M.<br />
(Glasgow Caledonian University)<br />
Innovations in sexual health are rapidly transforming the location, implementation and meaning of testing for many<br />
groups of people including men who have sex with men. Key innovations include the use of social media to assess<br />
risk, and the use of self-test (or ‘home test’ kits) to receive diagnoses, seek treatment and access support and<br />
potentially partner notification.<br />
This paper analyses the narratives of key stake-holders involved in the network of implementation of such innovations<br />
(n=45). It analyses data from focus group and one to one discussions with gay men (and other men who have sex<br />
with men), community organisations and community leaders and a range of NHS and government staff.<br />
Findings stress deep uncertainties with regard to engaging with such technological innovations, they highlight the<br />
fraught balance of both the opportunities and constraints to construct a new public health. Therein new subjectivities,<br />
risks and uncertainties proliferate and the relationships between public and private are contorted though the radical<br />
partial privatisation of intimate health care.<br />
Negotiating ‘New’ HIV Technologies, Intimacy and Condoms: Exploring Gay and Bisexual Men’s Responses<br />
to Prep and Tasp in Scotland<br />
Young, I., Flowers, P., McDaid, L.<br />
(University of Glasgow)<br />
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and Treatment as Prevention (TasP) - both of which harness the preventative effects<br />
of HIV treatment (ARVs) - have emerged as major new HIV prevention technologies. While PrEP and TasP reflect<br />
significant clinical discoveries, there has been limited and uneven exploration of if and how these technologies might<br />
be integrated into existing sexual risk management practices. We conducted qualitative research in Scotland with<br />
communities most affected by HIV to better understand the implications of PrEP and TasP. Our presentation draws on<br />
five focus groups and 20 in-depth interviews with gay and bisexual men and explores how participants imagined these<br />
new HIV prevention technologies in the context of existing sexual practices, and in particular relation to condoms.<br />
While the condom has often been described as a barrier to intimacy, it emerged as a critical component of PrEP and<br />
TasP. Participants reacted strongly to PrEP and the notion that an ‘imagined’ community of gay and bisexual men<br />
might abandon years of condom-based safer sex practices since condoms reflected not only a physical barrier to HIV,<br />
but a shared practice of care for others. For those men living with HIV and within the context of TasP, the condom<br />
formed a critical element in not only their risk reduction strategies, but in the formation and/or maintenance of intimacy<br />
with sexual partners. Our findings suggest that ‘new’ HIV technologies may allow gay and bisexual men to renegotiate<br />
the role of condoms and forms of intimacy in their sexual practice.<br />
‘Personal Communities’, ‘Hidden Solidarities’, and HIV Testing Technologies<br />
Boydell, N., McDaid, L.M., Buston, K.<br />
(University of Glasgow)<br />
Collective responses to HIV have been important to the establishment of safer sex practices and successful HIV<br />
prevention among gay men. However, some have noted the changing role of gay communities in HIV prevention,<br />
where a ‘loss of community’ may have implications for future HIV prevention (Davis, 2008). This paper explores the<br />
‘hidden solidarities’ articulated by young gay and bisexual men through their accounts of their personal, social<br />
relationships with friends within their ‘personal communities’ (Holt, 2011; Spencer & Pahl, 2006). Based on analysis of<br />
data drawn from interviews with 30 gay and bisexual men, aged 18-29 years and living in various regions of Scotland,<br />
I explore the ways in which affective ties between the young men and their friends, and shared understandings of<br />
sexual risk, shape and inform their responses to both the concept, and practice, of ‘safer sex’. By extending<br />
BSA Annual Conference 2015 296<br />
Glasgow Caledonian University