09.04.2015 Views

Programme full

Programme full

Programme full

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Friday 17 April 2015 09:00 - 10:30<br />

ROUNDTABLE SESSIONS<br />

hospices or hospitals, traditional storytelling can offer a 'way in' to researching the impact of emotions at work, by<br />

providing some distance from 'real life' and also a structure with which to then address very personal 'real life' tales.<br />

Medicine, Health and Illness 2<br />

ROUNDTABLE 11, CONFERENCE HALL, HAMISH WOOD BUILDING<br />

Information as a Regulatory Device: The Politics of Data in the Post-Reform NHS<br />

Speed, E., Pettinger, L., Goffey, A.<br />

(University of Essex)<br />

The 2012 Health and Social Care Act demanded fundamental changes to the organisation of the NHS. The reforms<br />

lauded an 'information revolution', where the use and utility of information, including 'big data' will enable better local<br />

and national provision/commissioning, and more effective levels of health observation and surveillance, using<br />

population metrics. The ubiquity of rhetoric of the positive power of information in the post-reform NHS sits<br />

uncomfortably alongside a clear political and organizational failure to elaborate how these processes are actually<br />

going to work.<br />

In this paper we consider the onerous and complex demands for information recording, analysis and reporting,<br />

focusing on two features of these expectations. First, how can the demands for routine information recording be put<br />

into place in a setting where - because of the 'any qualified provider' regulations of the HSCA, care providers are<br />

simultaneously collaborators and competitors. Second, what effects do these information-reporting requirements have<br />

on professional practice, standing and experiences of work. We contend that the apparent neutrality of information as<br />

a regulatory device is politically important to securing radical institutional change to such a sacred institution as the<br />

NHS, but assigns significant power to private sector service providers and healthcare software companies in so doing.<br />

‘What was Your Blood Sugar Reading This Morning?’: Diabetes Self-management and Biological Citizenship<br />

on Facebook<br />

Hunt, D., Koteyko, N.<br />

(Queen Mary University of London)<br />

Social networking sites (SNSs) have become a salient venue for the consumption and production of neoliberal health<br />

discourse by individuals and organisations. These platforms offer both opportunities for individuals to accrue<br />

networked coping resources and a means for organisations to promote their agendas within a growing 'digital patient<br />

experience economy' (Lupton, 2014).<br />

Focusing specifically on diabetes and drawing on methods of critical and multisemiotic discourse analysis, this paper<br />

examines the interactional styles and multimodal representation of diabetes on three organisational pages on<br />

Facebook and the digital affordances these organisations employ as they publish content online. Popular diabetes<br />

pages utilise the opportunities for social interaction afforded by Facebook's architecture and combine risk<br />

management information with promotional content designed to foster communication between organisations and their<br />

audiences. By foregrounding online participation and reflexive management of health risks, these pages open a new<br />

frontier of 'biological citizenship' (Rose and Novas, 2004) in which users interweave personal interactions on SNSs<br />

with responsible self-care, consumption of health information and health activism. By contrasting content from<br />

commercial, non-profit and government health organisations, we note the role of Facebook in allowing organisations<br />

to derive value from biological citizenship and facilitating wider policy changes to the nature of healthcare delivery.<br />

Lupton, D. 2014. The commodification of patient opinion: the digital patient experience economy in the age of big data.<br />

Sociology of Health & Illness. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12109.<br />

Rose, N. and Novas, C. 2004. Biological Citizenship. In: Ong A and Collier SJ (eds) Global Assemblages. Oxford:<br />

Blackwell Publishing, pp. 439-463.<br />

237 BSA Annual Conference 2015<br />

Glasgow Caledonian University

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!