Programme full
Programme full
Programme full
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Friday 17 April 2015 11:00 - 12:30<br />
PAPER SESSION 7<br />
sector and often a requirement for entering Aidland which includes a variety of aid organizations, such as nongovernmental<br />
organizations and UN agencies. Aidwork can be precarious employment and privilege of those who<br />
have independent means, i.e. who can afford to forgo a regular income. Paradoxically, it is a privilege to participate in<br />
low or unpaid precarious aidwork. Given intermittent work-patterns, aidwork is characterized by both high intensity and<br />
by breaks in between assignments and living and working conditions in rural and remote areas can be understood as<br />
a form of 'slow living' which involves a distance from consumer culture and a search for authenticity. Aidwork raises<br />
important questions concerning the meaning of work and can be considered a vocation and a means to selfactualization.<br />
It enables one to explore the complex and contradictory relationship between self-realization, trauma<br />
and personal growth. Paradoxically, those who engage in aidwork experience well-being which is gained through<br />
confronting the suffering of others which they try to alleviate or which demonstrates their own privileged position.<br />
Moreover, given the increasing number of attacks on aid personnel, aidwork can be considered edgework or voluntary<br />
risk-taking which is a response to alienating and highly regulated working conditions.<br />
More than Just Money?: A Sociological Analysis of the Relationship between Feminist Organisations and<br />
Funders in Scotland<br />
Maxwell, T.<br />
(University of Aberdeen)<br />
Feminist researchers have sought to uncover women's experiences of violence (Walby 2009, Stanko 2003, Sweetman<br />
1998, Kelly 1988) and have demonstrated, albeit with differing points of focus and emphasis, that tangible, systemic<br />
and symbolic violence towards women is a cause and consequence of asymmetrical gender systems of power<br />
(Kordvani 2002, Morgan and Bjorkert 2006, Zizek 2009). These insights have encouraged the spread of grassroots<br />
feminist organisations across the world, many of whom are now, financially supported by local and national<br />
government (Martin 2005, Metzendorf 2005, Ferree and Martin 1995, English 2011, Reineltl 1994). However how<br />
stable and sustainable are feminist organisations? What are some of the benefits and challenges of receiving funding<br />
from government?<br />
In this paper, I will describe and reflect upon the experiences of workers in feminist organisations gathered through<br />
qualitative interviews. I will argue that feminist organisations appear to be under considerable strain as a result of the<br />
impacts of the financial crisis, coupled with increasing demand which is leading organisations to use more and more<br />
creative and innovative strategies in order to survive. This paper will specifically focus upon specific funding streams<br />
available to feminist organisations; the Violence Against Women Fund, Rape Crisis Specific Fund and the Strategic<br />
Interventions Fund. These are financed by the Scottish Government's Equality Unit and administered by the Voluntary<br />
Action Fund in Scotland. I will explore the relationship between funders and feminist organisations to examine if the<br />
interactions and partnerships are about more than just money.<br />
Work, Employment and Economic Life 2<br />
W823, HAMISH WOOD BUILDING<br />
Opting out and in: High and Low-income Women Working on Their Own Terms<br />
Biese, I., McKie, L.<br />
(Hanken School of Economics)<br />
During the past decade opting out has been debated both academically and in the media. The debate has mainly<br />
been about high-powered women who opt out of successful careers to stay home <strong>full</strong>time with their children. Recent<br />
research has introduced a new definition of opting out, that is not limited to stay-at-home mothers, but that rather is an<br />
opting out of mainstream career models to opt in to alternative lifestyles where one can live and work on one's own<br />
terms. For women with children or other care responsibilities, this means opting in to lifestyles where they can<br />
combine work and care in a meaningful way, not having to give one up for the other. However, it is not only highpowered,<br />
high-income women who struggle to combine different areas of life. Low-income women struggle to find a<br />
sense of control over their lives as it becomes increasingly difficult to create coherent life narratives in this hectic era<br />
of globalization and individualization. Unlike high-income women, low-income women have less monetary resources<br />
to create solutions that work for them. This paper examines the opting out and in experiences of high-income women<br />
in Finland and the US and low-income women in Scotland. Narratives illuminate similar, yet different experiences.<br />
Women talk of making sense of caring and working 'on their own terms' but these differ across spatial and economic<br />
contexts as well as the women's social capital. We conclude by reflecting on women's embodiment of the tensions<br />
concerning working and caring in multifaceted unequal societies.<br />
283 BSA Annual Conference 2015<br />
Glasgow Caledonian University