Programme full
Programme full
Programme full
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Thursday 16 April 2016 15:30 - 17:00<br />
PAPER SESSION 6 / PECHA KUCHA SESSIONS<br />
through the findings of the collaboration of sociologists and the BBC in the Great British Class Survey. The 6 speakers<br />
are authors of the edited book and will use the presentation format of the Pecha Kucha in order to talk about social<br />
class and social inequality in Britain today.<br />
Mckenzie, L., Savage, M., Friedman, S., Miles, A., Laurison, D.<br />
(London School of Economics and Political Science)<br />
Frontiers 2<br />
W828, HAMISH WOOD BUILDING<br />
PEER REVIEWING: TIPS AND PITFALLS<br />
The peer review process lies at the heart of academic activity – playing a key role in the evaluation and<br />
communication of research findings. Learning how to review effectively is therefore an important element of being an<br />
academic. Sarah Neal (University of Surrey) and Karim Murji (The Open University), Editors of Sociology will lead<br />
this session exploring the process of peer reviewing articles submitted for publication in journals.<br />
Sociology is the flagship journal of the BSA, publishing outstanding and original articles which advance our<br />
understanding of the widest possible range of sociological topics. Publishing high quality research depends on an<br />
equally high quality peer review process and peer reviewers are an essential part of the journal ecology and the<br />
advancement of research. As Editors of Sociology, Sarah and Karim have a wealth of knowledge about what makes a<br />
good review, how it is used to develop research publications and how to get involved in reviewing with<br />
Sociology. Scholars of all ages and stages can make great reviewers so we encourage all delegates to attend and<br />
find out more about contributing to the discipline through peer review.<br />
Medicine, Health and Illness<br />
C236, CHARLES OAKLEY BUILDING<br />
IS AUSTERITY HARMING SOCIETAL WELL-BEING? EVIDENCE FROM THE UK<br />
At a state banquet for the new Lord Mayor, David Cameron spoke of a new economic reality that necessitated<br />
'permanent austerity'. Much of the public debate surrounding the introduction of policies intended to reduce the UK's<br />
public debt has focused on whether they will achieve this economic aim. Yet, cuts to public services and the welfare<br />
state are not merely matters of balancing the books. The human dimension of austerity continues to be an<br />
understudied area and, more importantly, it remains largely absent from the public conversation. While economic data<br />
is published quarterly, social scientists are only now beginning to be able to document the social and health-related<br />
consequences of austerity. In this panel we bring together an interdisciplinary group of researchers from sociology,<br />
public health, and social policy whose work addresses these human dimensions of austerity politics. Each of the<br />
speakers will evaluate the effects of specific aspects of austerity measures enacted in the UK on different health and<br />
well-being outcomes, including, 1) the consequences of increasing the minimum wage for health behaviours and<br />
mental health; 2) the impact of decentralization of the social fund for food insecurity; 3) the impact of sanctions for<br />
Jobseekers on poverty and employment outcomes; and 4) the effects of Working Capability Assessments on mental<br />
health. Collectively, this panel documents regressive trends in societal well-being associated with austerity, findings<br />
that are particularly troubling in light of the UK outlook of ‘permanent austerity’.<br />
The Mental Health Impact of the Work Capability Assessment in England: A Longitudinal Cross-Local<br />
Authority Study<br />
Barr, B., Taylor-Robinson D. Stuckler D, Loopstra, R., Reeves, A., Whitehead, M.<br />
(University of Liverpool)<br />
There are several indications that the deterioration in mental health that followed the recent economic crisis has<br />
continued into the period of economic recovery . This has led some to hypothesize that welfare reforms and cuts in<br />
public expenditure are sustaining or exacerbating the decline. One aspect of welfare reform has been the<br />
implementation of more stringent medical assessment for individuals receiving Incapacity Benefit, i.e., Work Capability<br />
Assessment (WCA), which result in fewer people being eligible for this support. Using quarterly data between October<br />
205 BSA Annual Conference 2015<br />
Glasgow Caledonian University