Programme full
Programme full
Programme full
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Wednesday 15 April 2015 at 09:00 - 10:30<br />
PAPER SESSION 1<br />
Cities, Mobilities, Place and Space<br />
M532, GEORGE MOORE BUILDING<br />
Securitisation and Cosmopolitanism: A Tale of Two Cities?<br />
Pieri, E.<br />
(University of Manchester)<br />
This paper investigates how the process of securitisation and the mobilisation of aspirations towards cosmopolitanism<br />
interact to reconfigure urban space.<br />
Scholarship focusing on Western cities increasingly contends that they have become militarised and describes their<br />
role in building resilience. The fortification of the built environment, in particular that of affluent neighbourhoods, has<br />
been traced in studies which lament the spread of privatised space and gated residential solutions, and which criticise<br />
the politics of marginality that they reinforce. Nonetheless, a much debated characteristic of the urban remains its<br />
diversity, with the unpredictability and heterogeneity of encounters it allows. While debates over multiculturalism,<br />
intercultural relations, migration, cohesion and diversity are always high on the political agenda, there has been a<br />
resurgence of interest in cosmopolitanism both within academic debates and in policy discourse.<br />
Taking Manchester city centre as a case study, this paper questions the relationship between cosmopolitanism and<br />
securitisation and their role in place making. It investigates the understandings of cosmopolitanism operationalised in<br />
Manchester by various stakeholders – recovered through interviews, focus groups, ethnography and documentary<br />
analysis - and contrasts them with those circulating in contemporary scholarly debates. Exploring whether<br />
securitisation and cosmopolitanism are best thought as conflicting or mutually validating trends, this paper considers<br />
the type of spaces and practices they produce.<br />
Power, Knowledge and Freedom of Information<br />
Sheaff, M.<br />
(Plymouth University)<br />
The paternalism of the post-war Welfare State, with limited citizen and user involvement, has met challenges from<br />
different directions, including democratic and market-oriented alternatives. Although the latter appear to have gained<br />
greater ascendancy, a significant achievement of the former was the Freedom of Information Act 2000.<br />
In his foreword to the preceding White Paper, 'Your Right to Know' (1997), the Prime Minister foresaw, 'a fundamental<br />
and vital change in the relationship between government and governed'. He added: 'The traditional culture of secrecy<br />
will only be broken down by giving people in the United Kingdom the right to know.'<br />
Writing in his autobiography, in 2010, Tony Blair's views had changed: 'Freedom of Information. . . . I look at those<br />
words as I write them, and feel like shaking my head till it drops off my shoulders. You idiot. You naive, foolish,<br />
irresponsible nincompoop. . . . Where was Sir Humphrey when I needed him?'<br />
The theme of transition – from State paternalism to the rhetoric of democratic participation – and subsequent retreat<br />
towards a 'confidentiality' and 'privacy' is explored in this paper. Empirical material for the paper is drawn from a study<br />
in which the Freedom of Information Act was used to explore decision-making within the National Health Service. The<br />
apparent contrast that emerged, between public accounts, and information disclosed through FOI requests, is used to<br />
consider wider issues of knowledge, control, power and accountabilities.<br />
Governing the Identity of Asylum Seekers in Australia<br />
Revi, B.<br />
(University of Chester)<br />
Despite Australia's history as a migrant nation, the arrival by boat of foreigners to seek asylum has attracted public<br />
controversy and harsh policy responses. Boat arrivals have been linked to broader economic and cultural issues,<br />
reflecting the impact of neoliberal reforms undertaken in Australia since the 1980s.<br />
This paper adopts a discourse approach to investigate the impact of neoliberal reforms on Australian identity, and a<br />
governmentality approach to investigate how the neoliberal actors have constructed harsh asylum policy as insurance<br />
against risks to population growth, infrastructure, jobs, and services.<br />
61 BSA Annual Conference 2015<br />
Glasgow Caledonian University