09.04.2015 Views

Programme full

Programme full

Programme full

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Wednesday 15 April 2015 at 09:00 - 10:30<br />

PAPER SESSION 1<br />

Cities, Mobilities, Place and Space<br />

M532, GEORGE MOORE BUILDING<br />

Securitisation and Cosmopolitanism: A Tale of Two Cities?<br />

Pieri, E.<br />

(University of Manchester)<br />

This paper investigates how the process of securitisation and the mobilisation of aspirations towards cosmopolitanism<br />

interact to reconfigure urban space.<br />

Scholarship focusing on Western cities increasingly contends that they have become militarised and describes their<br />

role in building resilience. The fortification of the built environment, in particular that of affluent neighbourhoods, has<br />

been traced in studies which lament the spread of privatised space and gated residential solutions, and which criticise<br />

the politics of marginality that they reinforce. Nonetheless, a much debated characteristic of the urban remains its<br />

diversity, with the unpredictability and heterogeneity of encounters it allows. While debates over multiculturalism,<br />

intercultural relations, migration, cohesion and diversity are always high on the political agenda, there has been a<br />

resurgence of interest in cosmopolitanism both within academic debates and in policy discourse.<br />

Taking Manchester city centre as a case study, this paper questions the relationship between cosmopolitanism and<br />

securitisation and their role in place making. It investigates the understandings of cosmopolitanism operationalised in<br />

Manchester by various stakeholders – recovered through interviews, focus groups, ethnography and documentary<br />

analysis - and contrasts them with those circulating in contemporary scholarly debates. Exploring whether<br />

securitisation and cosmopolitanism are best thought as conflicting or mutually validating trends, this paper considers<br />

the type of spaces and practices they produce.<br />

Power, Knowledge and Freedom of Information<br />

Sheaff, M.<br />

(Plymouth University)<br />

The paternalism of the post-war Welfare State, with limited citizen and user involvement, has met challenges from<br />

different directions, including democratic and market-oriented alternatives. Although the latter appear to have gained<br />

greater ascendancy, a significant achievement of the former was the Freedom of Information Act 2000.<br />

In his foreword to the preceding White Paper, 'Your Right to Know' (1997), the Prime Minister foresaw, 'a fundamental<br />

and vital change in the relationship between government and governed'. He added: 'The traditional culture of secrecy<br />

will only be broken down by giving people in the United Kingdom the right to know.'<br />

Writing in his autobiography, in 2010, Tony Blair's views had changed: 'Freedom of Information. . . . I look at those<br />

words as I write them, and feel like shaking my head till it drops off my shoulders. You idiot. You naive, foolish,<br />

irresponsible nincompoop. . . . Where was Sir Humphrey when I needed him?'<br />

The theme of transition – from State paternalism to the rhetoric of democratic participation – and subsequent retreat<br />

towards a 'confidentiality' and 'privacy' is explored in this paper. Empirical material for the paper is drawn from a study<br />

in which the Freedom of Information Act was used to explore decision-making within the National Health Service. The<br />

apparent contrast that emerged, between public accounts, and information disclosed through FOI requests, is used to<br />

consider wider issues of knowledge, control, power and accountabilities.<br />

Governing the Identity of Asylum Seekers in Australia<br />

Revi, B.<br />

(University of Chester)<br />

Despite Australia's history as a migrant nation, the arrival by boat of foreigners to seek asylum has attracted public<br />

controversy and harsh policy responses. Boat arrivals have been linked to broader economic and cultural issues,<br />

reflecting the impact of neoliberal reforms undertaken in Australia since the 1980s.<br />

This paper adopts a discourse approach to investigate the impact of neoliberal reforms on Australian identity, and a<br />

governmentality approach to investigate how the neoliberal actors have constructed harsh asylum policy as insurance<br />

against risks to population growth, infrastructure, jobs, and services.<br />

61 BSA Annual Conference 2015<br />

Glasgow Caledonian University

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!