Programme full
Programme full
Programme full
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Thursday 16 April 2016 15:30 - 17:00<br />
PAPER SESSION 6 / PECHA KUCHA SESSIONS<br />
include more quantitative data in their research? And can qualitative data be presented in different ways to make it<br />
more amenable to policy makers?<br />
Building Bridges between Climate Scientists and Sceptical Voices: Implications for Public Perceptions of<br />
Climate Change<br />
Sharman, A., Howarth, C.<br />
(London School of Economics and Political Science)<br />
Representations of the climate debate, particularly those in the public sphere, tend to focus on a dualistic and<br />
polarised disagreement about the scientific reality of anthropogenic climate change. These depictions fail to capture<br />
the associated, and often more nuanced, political dimensions of the debate, resulting in a lack of understanding of<br />
what constitutes a normal sceptical scientific process and how this relates to the process of developing political<br />
solutions. Moreover, this emphasis on polarised disagreement obscures important areas of uncertainty that do require<br />
further scientific investigation and policy development, as well as the motivations that underpin the different arguments<br />
expressed. If the public perceive that an active debate about climate change focuses only on science, it is likely to<br />
subsequently influence perceived need for and appropriate type of climate change policy response. This paper<br />
presents results from 22 interviews with climate scientists and sceptical voices on their experience within the climate<br />
change debate, focusing in particular on perceptions of themselves and those expressing arguments that differ from<br />
their own, as well as how the debate is framed. It provides a critical analysis of the motivations behind the different<br />
actors' experiences of the climate debate and suggests areas where self-reflexivity, as well as identifying common<br />
motivations may be used as a means for useful dialogue across areas of both scientific and political debate. It also<br />
assesses the extent to which perception of the existence of a polarised debate impacts public perception of the issue<br />
itself.<br />
Families and Relationships<br />
M225, GEORGE MOORE BUILDING<br />
'I Suppose It's Always Developing Really, It's Constantly Changing I Think': The Fluid and Relational Nature of<br />
Fathering in 'Normative' Context<br />
Earley, V.<br />
(University of Sheffield)<br />
Theorising about fathering has been shaped by a multitude of academic disciplines, cultural institutions and, perhaps<br />
most vociferously, by parents themselves. However, there is a predilection for conceptualising parenting, in general,<br />
as outcome driven, done to children as passive recipients of the process. While the discipline of Childhood Studies<br />
has allowed for the reconceptualisation of children as autonomous social actors within the constraints of the social<br />
structures in which they live their everyday lives, explorations of parenting have remained stoically resistant hearing<br />
children's voices in 'normative' circumstances. Fathering, specifically, has also primarily been explored in<br />
problematised contexts and little is known about the 'normative' experience against which the outcome discourse of<br />
paternal involvement in children's lives is measured.<br />
My ongoing PhD case study research with families suggests that children, fathers and mothers understand fathering in<br />
diverse, relational and adaptive ways and that notions of fathering are individually located in time and space, arising<br />
from the experiences and understandings of family life and family roles. I argue that an idealised understanding of<br />
what fathering should be as a fixed and unmalleable notion is pervasive within cultural and structural representations<br />
of fathering and fatherhood and that this construction may be challenged through in depth exploration of fathering with<br />
families in what I describe as 'normative context'.<br />
This paper will discuss some of the key themes emerging from the interviews undertaken with families, with particular<br />
focus given to the fluidity of fathering as a process that is negotiated and embedded over time.<br />
Fathering and Sport: Families, Men and Masculinity<br />
Fletcher, T.<br />
(Leeds Beckett University)<br />
The concept of fathering and the role(s) of fathers are changing. With the shifting status of women, particularly in<br />
employment, increasing breakdown and reconstitution of families, traditional views of men as occupying instrumental<br />
roles of breadwinner and disciplinarian are evolving. However, as the very essence of fathering is being challenged,<br />
203 BSA Annual Conference 2015<br />
Glasgow Caledonian University