09.04.2015 Views

Programme full

Programme full

Programme full

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Wednesday 15 April 2015 16:00 - 17:30<br />

PAPER SESSION 3<br />

Lifecourse<br />

W828, HAMISH WOOD BUILDING<br />

‘We’ve Had Our Sex Life Way Back’: Old(er) Care Home Residents and Sexual/Intimate Citizenship<br />

Simpson, P., Horne, M., Brown Wilson, C., Dickinson, T., Br, L.<br />

(University of Manchester)<br />

This think-piece addresses the neglected if not taboo topic of older care home residents and sexual/intimate<br />

citizenship. It examines three related bodies of work. First, the focus in the general literature on care homes for older<br />

people on prolonging physical and/or psychological autonomy has overshadowed concerns with sexuality/intimacy<br />

(Bauer 1999). There is also a tension in this work between views of care homes as sites of control (Wiersma and<br />

Dupuis 2010) and as empowering spaces (Knight et al 2010). The relations of care are more ambivalent than this<br />

binary formulation allows (Twigg 2000). Second, the literature on sexuality and ageing/care homes addresses<br />

sexuality in limited, often sexological ways, though some work highlights the problem of ageism intersecting with<br />

differences of gender, sexuality, class and race (Richardson and Lazur 1995). Third, work concerned with the rights of<br />

lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans (LGB&T) residents has highlighted the problem of heteronormativity/homophobia and<br />

how individuals become 'twice hidden' because of ageism combined with the heterosexual assumption (Willis et al<br />

2013). All three bodies of work lack <strong>full</strong>er engagement with needs relating to sexuality/intimacy. We conclude by<br />

outlining an agenda for research based on more critical, sociologically-informed work (Hafford-Letchfield 2008) that<br />

recognizes residents' exclusion from sexuality/intimacy and identifies practical solutions to such problems.<br />

The Impossible Choice? Making Decisions of Care for Older Parents<br />

Morgan Brett, B.<br />

(University of East London)<br />

Witnessing one parent's ageing process and the associated dilemmas of placing a parent in care often cause 'midlife<br />

children' enormous emotional turmoil. Drawing upon data collected across four different qualitative and literature<br />

based research projects which I have worked on in recent years, the aim of this paper is to highlight the psychosocial<br />

dilemmas faced by midlife children of older parents, with the aim to improving inter-generational relationships. It will<br />

consider what practical, emotional and psychical effects does witnessing the increasing agedness and death of<br />

parents have on those in midlife? How are the relationships between the (midlife) child and their parents negotiated<br />

during this phase of the life course on a practical, emotional and psychical level? And how can care provision for older<br />

people be improved in order to support not only those in the older generations but also those in the midlife generation<br />

who are caring for them?<br />

Changing Perceptions of Identity Over the Lifecourse of Mass Observation Project Writers (1981-2014)<br />

Lindsey, R.<br />

(University of Southampton)<br />

The Mass Observation Project (MOP) is a volunteer writing project in which more than 3,500 self-selected individuals<br />

have written in response to themed questions -directives - sent out by the Mass Observation Archive (MOA) three<br />

times a year since 1981. Directives are wide-ranging, asking writers to write contemporary and retrospective accounts<br />

of their views on current events, descriptions of their lives and experiences, and descriptions of themselves.<br />

Cumulatively these responses provide rich insights into changes and continuities in writers' lives, and offer a strong<br />

sense of individual voice across the 1981-2014 timeframe. Whilst there has been very little analysis of MOP writers'<br />

characteristics, some social scientists have argued that the MOP is unreliable because certain sections of British<br />

society are underrepresented within this data-source.<br />

This paper draws on the findings from two longitudinal research projects to discuss who the MOP writers are. The first<br />

study followed 38 individual writers across time looking at their volunteering attitudes and behaviours. The second<br />

study, which is ongoing, uses mixed-methods to investigate the socio-economic characteristics of all the MOP's<br />

volunteer writers, the extent and nature of their engagement with the archive, and how the characteristics of<br />

respondents may have changed over time. This paper discusses preliminary qualitative analysis of MOP writing on<br />

identities, exploring continuity and change in individual writers' identities in relation to life-events, class and place over<br />

their life-courses. It examines the disconnection between shifting individual perceptions of class and quantitative<br />

longitudinal analyses of class that use occupation as a measure.<br />

BSA Annual Conference 2015 120<br />

Glasgow Caledonian University

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!