09.04.2015 Views

Programme full

Programme full

Programme full

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Wednesday 15 April 2015 11:00 - 12:30<br />

PAPER SESSION 2<br />

strategies of Russian-speaking scientists by using data collected from 61 semi-structured interviews conducted<br />

throughout 2013-14 in the USA, UK, Germany, France and Switzerland. The study triangulates the expressed<br />

opinions towards diasporic networks by collecting the publication data of participating scientists and analysing it<br />

quantitatively.<br />

The study builds on the ongoing discussion on transnational spaces and cultural capital in science, and investigates<br />

three strategies of diasporic behaviour of scientists: (1) alienation when all links with the home country are severed as<br />

a rational act, (2a) 'transnationalisation' of academic practice and utilisation diaspora contacts towards creation of<br />

clusters of Russian-speaking scientists in the host organisation, and (2b) engagement with loose informal networks of<br />

other scientists abroad. There is half-and-half split between the two strategies, the first more often found in the USA.<br />

Scientists express a great degree of ambivalence and radicalism towards engagement with the home country.<br />

The study stresses an ambiguous result of recent major policy initiatives by the Russian Federal Government to<br />

engage the diaspora abroad: the costly 'mega-grant' programme only managed to attract researchers who had<br />

already had dense collaborations with the home country, failing to achieve the goal of attracting the 'alienated'<br />

scientists whom it initially targeted.<br />

Border Security Technologies and Violence<br />

Conroy, A.<br />

(London School of Economics and Political Science)<br />

This paper argues for increased attention to the relationship scientists and innovators have with the border security<br />

technologies they develop. To date, scholars interested in border security have considered the deployment and<br />

adoption of such technologies and in doing so have mapped the use of military technologies in border surveillance<br />

and control, and identified the human rights abuses and violence that occur with their use. Little attention, however,<br />

has been paid to the conditions of their development. There is an extensive body of ethnographic literature on science<br />

and scientists; this includes ethnographic work that considers the relationship weapons scientists and innovators have<br />

with the weapons they create. Hugh Guterson's ethnography of a nuclear weapons lab illustrates the complex and<br />

myriad ethical relationships nuclear scientists develop with the weapons they work on. Carol Cohn charts the<br />

imbrication of the sexualized language defense intellectuals use to describe nuclear weapons with their gender<br />

identity and the way they narrativize the need for such weapons. These works offer a rich picture of the ethical<br />

maneuvers, organizational dynamics and interplay between identity and styles of reasoning in sites of weapons<br />

research and development. While border control and surveillance technologies have been described as violent or<br />

weapon-like, the relationship between border technologies and violence is more tenuous than that of weaponry<br />

specifically designed to do harm and, thus, begs the following questions: Why do border technology scientists and<br />

innovators do what they do? What do they think about what they produce?<br />

Social Divisions/Social Identities 1<br />

M228, GEORGE MOORE BUILDING<br />

CAST(E)ING ABOUT FOR A NEW SOCIETY: SOCIAL TRANSITIONS IN INDIA<br />

In the advent of Indian independence it was widely assumed that caste would fade away and diminish in significance<br />

as democracy took root. Instead, caste has been harnessed by political entrepreneurs and parties in multiple ways.<br />

On the one hand the electoral mobilisation of lower castes has been hailed as a ‘silent revolution’ that has<br />

democratised Indian politics and social relations; on the other, the rise of caste based political parties has led to<br />

expressions of caste pride and honour that have fuelled inter-caste animosity and violence. This session will bring<br />

together a range of papers that will reflect on the contested processes of caste change, and ask whether things have<br />

improved for those at the foot of the caste hierarchy or not.<br />

Different Dalit Women Speak Differently: Unravelling, through an Intersectional Lens, Narratives of Agency<br />

and Activism from Everyday Life in Rural North India<br />

Govinda, R.<br />

(University of Edinburgh)<br />

The notion of 'difference' has come to occupy centre stage in feminist politics the world over. In the context of<br />

contemporary Indian feminism, the notion of difference has been oft-invoked in relation to ex-untouchable women.<br />

Indeed, efforts have been made to emphasise ex-untouchable women's 'difference' vis-à-vis non-ex-untouchable<br />

103 BSA Annual Conference 2015<br />

Glasgow Caledonian University

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!