20.11.2012 Views

ATTP 5-0.1 Commander and Staff Officer Guide - Army Electronic ...

ATTP 5-0.1 Commander and Staff Officer Guide - Army Electronic ...

ATTP 5-0.1 Commander and Staff Officer Guide - Army Electronic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Troop Leading Procedures<br />

<strong>and</strong> status of their equipment. It also includes underst<strong>and</strong>ing the full array of assets in support of the unit.<br />

Leaders know, for example, how much indirect fire will become available, <strong>and</strong> when it is available, they<br />

will know the type. They consider any new limitations based on the level of training or recent fighting.<br />

Time Available<br />

5-36. Leaders not only appreciate how much time is available, they underst<strong>and</strong> the time-space aspects of<br />

preparing, moving, fighting, <strong>and</strong> sustaining. They view their own tasks <strong>and</strong> enemy actions in relation to<br />

time. They know how long it takes under such conditions to prepare for certain tasks (such as orders<br />

production, rehearsals, <strong>and</strong> subordinate element preparations). Most important, leaders monitor the time<br />

available. As events occur, they assess their impact on the unit timeline <strong>and</strong> update previous timelines for<br />

their subordinates. Timelines list all events that affect the unit <strong>and</strong> its subordinate elements.<br />

Civil Considerations<br />

5-37. Civil considerations are the influence of manmade infrastructure, civilian institutions, <strong>and</strong> activities<br />

of the civilian leaders, populations, <strong>and</strong> organizations within an area of operations on the conduct of<br />

military operations (FM 6-0). Rarely are military operations conducted in uninhabited areas. Most of the<br />

time, units are surrounded by noncombatants. These noncombatants include residents of the AO, local<br />

officials, <strong>and</strong> governmental <strong>and</strong> nongovernmental organizations. Based on information from higher<br />

headquarters <strong>and</strong> their own knowledge <strong>and</strong> judgment, leaders identify civil considerations that affect their<br />

mission. (See FM 6-0 <strong>and</strong> FM 3-05.401.) <strong>Comm<strong>and</strong>er</strong>s analyze civil considerations a using the six factors<br />

known by the memory aid ASCOPE: areas, structures, capabilities, organizations, people, <strong>and</strong> events.<br />

Course of Action Development<br />

5-38. Mission analysis provides information needed to develop COAs. COA development aims to<br />

determine one or more ways to accomplish the mission. At lower echelons, the mission may be a single<br />

task. Most missions <strong>and</strong> tasks can be accomplished in more than one way. Normally, leaders develop two<br />

or more COAs. However, in a time-constrained environment, they may develop only one. Leaders do not<br />

wait for a complete order before beginning COA development. Usable COAs are suitable, feasible,<br />

acceptable, distinguishable, <strong>and</strong> complete. Leaders develop COAs as soon as they have enough information<br />

to do so. To develop COAs, leaders focus on the actions the unit takes at the objective <strong>and</strong> conduct a<br />

reverse plan to the starting point.<br />

Analyze Relative Combat Power<br />

5-39. During COA development, leaders determine whether the unit has enough combat power to defeat<br />

the force (or accomplish a task in stability or civil support operations) against which it is arrayed by<br />

comparing the combat power of friendly <strong>and</strong> enemy forces. Leaders seek to determine where, when, <strong>and</strong><br />

how friendly combat power (the elements of intelligence, movement <strong>and</strong> maneuver, fires, sustainment,<br />

protection, <strong>and</strong> mission comm<strong>and</strong>) can overwhelm the enemy. It is a particularly difficult process if the unit<br />

is fighting a dissimilar unit. For example, if the unit is attacking or defending against an enemy mechanized<br />

force as opposed to a similarly equipped light infantry force. Below battalion level, relative combat power<br />

comparisons are rough <strong>and</strong> generally rely on professional judgment instead of numerical analysis. When an<br />

enemy is not the object of a particular mission or tasks, leaders conduct a troop-to-task analysis to<br />

determine if they have enough combat power to accomplish the tasks. For example, a company comm<strong>and</strong>er<br />

assigned the task “establish civil control in town X” would need to determine if they had enough Soldiers<br />

<strong>and</strong> equipment (to include vehicles <strong>and</strong> barrier materials) to establish the necessary check points <strong>and</strong><br />

security stations within the town to control the population in town X.<br />

Generate Options<br />

5-40. During this step, leaders brainstorm different ways to accomplish the mission. They determine the<br />

doctrinal requirements for the operation, including the tactical tasks normally assigned to subordinates.<br />

Doctrinal requirements give leaders a framework from which to develop COAs.<br />

14 September 2011 <strong>ATTP</strong> 5-<strong>0.1</strong> 5-7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!