20.11.2012 Views

ATTP 5-0.1 Commander and Staff Officer Guide - Army Electronic ...

ATTP 5-0.1 Commander and Staff Officer Guide - Army Electronic ...

ATTP 5-0.1 Commander and Staff Officer Guide - Army Electronic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 6<br />

1. SITUATION AND CONSIDERATIONS.<br />

a. Area of Interest. Identify <strong>and</strong> describe those factors of the area of interest that affect functional<br />

area considerations.<br />

b. Characteristics of the Area of Operations.<br />

(1) Terrain. State how terrain affects staff functional area’s capabilities.<br />

(2) Weather. State how weather affects staff functional area’s capabilities.<br />

(3) Enemy Forces. Describe enemy disposition, composition, strength, <strong>and</strong> systems within a<br />

functional area as well as enemy capabilities <strong>and</strong> possible courses of action (COAs) with<br />

respect to their effects on a functional area.<br />

(4) Friendly Forces. List current functional area resources in terms of equipment, personnel,<br />

<strong>and</strong> systems. Identify additional resources available for the functional area located at higher,<br />

adjacent, or other units. List those capabilities from other military <strong>and</strong> civilian partners that may<br />

be available to provide support within the functional area. Compare requirements to current<br />

capabilities <strong>and</strong> suggest solutions for satisfying discrepancies.<br />

(5) Civilian Considerations. Describe civil considerations that may affect the functional area<br />

to include possible support needed by civil authorities from the functional area as well as<br />

possible interference from civil aspects.<br />

c. Assumptions. List all assumptions that affect the functional area.<br />

2. MISSION. Show the restated mission resulting from mission analysis.<br />

3. COURSES OF ACTION.<br />

a. List friendly COAs that were war-gamed.<br />

b. List enemy actions or COAs that were templated that impact the functional area.<br />

c. List the evaluation criteria identified during COA analysis. All staffs use the same criteria.<br />

4. ANALYSIS. Analyze each COA using the evaluation criteria from COA analysis. Review enemy<br />

actions that impact the functional area as they relate to COAs. Identify issues, risks, <strong>and</strong><br />

deficiencies these enemy actions may create with respect to the functional area.<br />

5. COMPARISON. Compare COAs. Rank order COAs for each key consideration. Use a decision<br />

matrix to aid the comparison process.<br />

6. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS.<br />

a. Recommend the most supportable COAs from the perspective of the functional area.<br />

b. Prioritize <strong>and</strong> list issues, deficiencies, <strong>and</strong> risks <strong>and</strong> make recommendations on how to mitigate<br />

them.<br />

Figure 6-1. Generic base running estimate format<br />

6-6. The base running estimate addresses information unique to each functional area. It serves as the staff<br />

section’s initial assessment of the current readiness of equipment <strong>and</strong> personnel <strong>and</strong> of how the factors<br />

considered in the running estimate affect the staff’s ability to accomplish the mission. Each staff section<br />

identifies functional area friendly <strong>and</strong> enemy strengths, systems, training, morale, leadership, <strong>and</strong> weather<br />

<strong>and</strong> terrain effects, <strong>and</strong> how all these factors impact both the operational environment <strong>and</strong> area of<br />

operations. Because the running estimate is a picture relative to time, facts, <strong>and</strong> assumptions, each staff<br />

section constantly updates the estimate as new information arises, as assumptions become facts or are<br />

invalidated, when the mission changes, or when the comm<strong>and</strong>er requires additional input. Running<br />

estimates can be presented verbally or in writing.<br />

RUNNING ESTIMATES IN THE OPERATIONS PROCESS<br />

6-7. <strong>Comm<strong>and</strong>er</strong>s <strong>and</strong> staff sections immediately begin updating their running estimates upon receipt of<br />

mission. They continue to build <strong>and</strong> maintain their running estimates throughout out the operations process<br />

in planning, preparation, execution, <strong>and</strong> assessment as discussed in paragraphs 6-8 through 6-11.<br />

RUNNING ESTIMATES IN PLANNING<br />

6-8. During planning, running estimates are key sources of information during mission analysis.<br />

Following mission analysis, comm<strong>and</strong>ers <strong>and</strong> staff sections update their running estimates throughout the<br />

rest of the military decisionmaking process. Based on the mission <strong>and</strong> the initial comm<strong>and</strong>er’s intent, the<br />

staff develops one or more proposed courses of action (COAs) <strong>and</strong> continually refines its running estimates<br />

6-2 <strong>ATTP</strong> 5-<strong>0.1</strong> 14 September 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!