ATTP 5-0.1 Commander and Staff Officer Guide - Army Electronic ...
ATTP 5-0.1 Commander and Staff Officer Guide - Army Electronic ...
ATTP 5-0.1 Commander and Staff Officer Guide - Army Electronic ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 6<br />
1. SITUATION AND CONSIDERATIONS.<br />
a. Area of Interest. Identify <strong>and</strong> describe those factors of the area of interest that affect functional<br />
area considerations.<br />
b. Characteristics of the Area of Operations.<br />
(1) Terrain. State how terrain affects staff functional area’s capabilities.<br />
(2) Weather. State how weather affects staff functional area’s capabilities.<br />
(3) Enemy Forces. Describe enemy disposition, composition, strength, <strong>and</strong> systems within a<br />
functional area as well as enemy capabilities <strong>and</strong> possible courses of action (COAs) with<br />
respect to their effects on a functional area.<br />
(4) Friendly Forces. List current functional area resources in terms of equipment, personnel,<br />
<strong>and</strong> systems. Identify additional resources available for the functional area located at higher,<br />
adjacent, or other units. List those capabilities from other military <strong>and</strong> civilian partners that may<br />
be available to provide support within the functional area. Compare requirements to current<br />
capabilities <strong>and</strong> suggest solutions for satisfying discrepancies.<br />
(5) Civilian Considerations. Describe civil considerations that may affect the functional area<br />
to include possible support needed by civil authorities from the functional area as well as<br />
possible interference from civil aspects.<br />
c. Assumptions. List all assumptions that affect the functional area.<br />
2. MISSION. Show the restated mission resulting from mission analysis.<br />
3. COURSES OF ACTION.<br />
a. List friendly COAs that were war-gamed.<br />
b. List enemy actions or COAs that were templated that impact the functional area.<br />
c. List the evaluation criteria identified during COA analysis. All staffs use the same criteria.<br />
4. ANALYSIS. Analyze each COA using the evaluation criteria from COA analysis. Review enemy<br />
actions that impact the functional area as they relate to COAs. Identify issues, risks, <strong>and</strong><br />
deficiencies these enemy actions may create with respect to the functional area.<br />
5. COMPARISON. Compare COAs. Rank order COAs for each key consideration. Use a decision<br />
matrix to aid the comparison process.<br />
6. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS.<br />
a. Recommend the most supportable COAs from the perspective of the functional area.<br />
b. Prioritize <strong>and</strong> list issues, deficiencies, <strong>and</strong> risks <strong>and</strong> make recommendations on how to mitigate<br />
them.<br />
Figure 6-1. Generic base running estimate format<br />
6-6. The base running estimate addresses information unique to each functional area. It serves as the staff<br />
section’s initial assessment of the current readiness of equipment <strong>and</strong> personnel <strong>and</strong> of how the factors<br />
considered in the running estimate affect the staff’s ability to accomplish the mission. Each staff section<br />
identifies functional area friendly <strong>and</strong> enemy strengths, systems, training, morale, leadership, <strong>and</strong> weather<br />
<strong>and</strong> terrain effects, <strong>and</strong> how all these factors impact both the operational environment <strong>and</strong> area of<br />
operations. Because the running estimate is a picture relative to time, facts, <strong>and</strong> assumptions, each staff<br />
section constantly updates the estimate as new information arises, as assumptions become facts or are<br />
invalidated, when the mission changes, or when the comm<strong>and</strong>er requires additional input. Running<br />
estimates can be presented verbally or in writing.<br />
RUNNING ESTIMATES IN THE OPERATIONS PROCESS<br />
6-7. <strong>Comm<strong>and</strong>er</strong>s <strong>and</strong> staff sections immediately begin updating their running estimates upon receipt of<br />
mission. They continue to build <strong>and</strong> maintain their running estimates throughout out the operations process<br />
in planning, preparation, execution, <strong>and</strong> assessment as discussed in paragraphs 6-8 through 6-11.<br />
RUNNING ESTIMATES IN PLANNING<br />
6-8. During planning, running estimates are key sources of information during mission analysis.<br />
Following mission analysis, comm<strong>and</strong>ers <strong>and</strong> staff sections update their running estimates throughout the<br />
rest of the military decisionmaking process. Based on the mission <strong>and</strong> the initial comm<strong>and</strong>er’s intent, the<br />
staff develops one or more proposed courses of action (COAs) <strong>and</strong> continually refines its running estimates<br />
6-2 <strong>ATTP</strong> 5-<strong>0.1</strong> 14 September 2011