20.11.2012 Views

ATTP 5-0.1 Commander and Staff Officer Guide - Army Electronic ...

ATTP 5-0.1 Commander and Staff Officer Guide - Army Electronic ...

ATTP 5-0.1 Commander and Staff Officer Guide - Army Electronic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MEMORANDUM FOR<br />

Problem Solving, <strong>Staff</strong> Studies, <strong>and</strong> Decision Papers<br />

11-77. Address the decision paper to the decisionmaker. Include thru addressees or on the routing slip, as<br />

specified by comm<strong>and</strong> policy.<br />

SUBJECT<br />

11-78. Briefly state the decision’s subject. Be specific as the reader should not have to begin reading the<br />

body of the decision paper to figure out the subject. “Decision Paper” is not an acceptable subject.<br />

FOR DECISION<br />

11-79. Paragraph 1 states, “For DECISION.” (Paragraph headings may be either underlined or bolded,<br />

according to comm<strong>and</strong> policy.) Indicate if the decision is time-sensitive, tied to an event, or has a suspense<br />

date to a higher headquarters. Show internal suspenses on the routing slip, if necessary. Do not show them<br />

in this paragraph.<br />

PURPOSE<br />

11-80. In paragraph 2, state clearly the decision required, as an infinitive phrase. An infinitive phrase uses<br />

a verb, but has no subject, for example, “To determine the...,” or, “To obtain....” Include in the purpose<br />

statement who, what, when, <strong>and</strong> where, if pertinent.<br />

RECOMMENDATION<br />

11-81. In paragraph 3, recommend a solution or solutions to the problem. If there are several<br />

recommendations, state each one in a separate subparagraph.<br />

BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION<br />

11-82. Paragraph 4 explains the origin of the action, why the problem exists, <strong>and</strong> a summary of events in<br />

chronological form. It helps put the problem in perspective <strong>and</strong> provides an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the<br />

alternatives <strong>and</strong> the recommendation. If the decision paper is the result of a tasking document, refer to that<br />

document in paragraph 4 <strong>and</strong> place it at enclosure 2.<br />

IMPACT<br />

11-83. Paragraph 5 states the impact of the recommended decision. Address each affected area in a<br />

separate subparagraph, for example, personnel, equipment, funding, environment, <strong>and</strong> stationing. State<br />

parties affected by the recommendation <strong>and</strong> the extent to which they are affected.<br />

COORDINATION, APPROVAL LINE, POINT OF CONTACT, SIGNATURE BLOCK, AND<br />

ENCLOSURES<br />

11-84. The coordination, approval line, point of contact, signature block, <strong>and</strong> enclosures follow the same<br />

directions as for a staff study. See paragraphs 11-43 through 11-68.<br />

STAFF STUDY ASSEMBLY<br />

11-85. Action officers assemble a staff study in a manila folder. See Figure 11-4, page 11-4. Clipped to<br />

the front cover is the classification, if needed, <strong>and</strong> a routing slip. Assemble the decision paper inside the<br />

manila folder with the implementing memo, the tasker, the concurrences <strong>and</strong> nonconcurrences, <strong>and</strong> lastly<br />

any background information. Tab the staff actions <strong>and</strong> clip them to the inside of the back cover of the<br />

manila folder.<br />

14 September 2011 <strong>ATTP</strong> 5-<strong>0.1</strong> 11-13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!