11.07.2015 Views

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Introduction:Mike Reed - Wansbeck General Hospital - Ashinton, United KingdomPaul Partington - Wansbeck General Hospital - Ashington, United Kingdom*Email: ipgill@yahoo.comThe aim <strong>of</strong> this study is to report <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> Revision hip arthroplasty using large diameter,metal on metal bearing implants- minimum 2 year follow up.Methods:A single centre retrospective study was performed <strong>of</strong> 22 consecutive patients who <strong>under</strong>wentacetabular revision surgery using metal on metal bearing implants between 2004 and 2007.Birmingham hip resurfacing (BHR) cup was used in all patients - monoblock, uncemented,without additional screws in 16 cases and cemented within reinforcement or reconstruction ringin 6 cases.Femoral revisions were carried out as necessary.Results:There were 16 men and 6 women with a mean age <strong>of</strong> 71 years (51-83). Revision surgery wasperformed for aseptic loosening in 10, infected primary hip arthroplasty in 8, infectedHemiarthroplasty in 1 and Peri-pros<strong>the</strong>tic fracture with loosening in 3 patients. A 2-stagerevision was performed for all infected hips.One patient died and <strong>the</strong> remaining 21 patients had clinical and radiological assessment at amean 35 months (24-60). The mean Harris hip score was 75 (23-98) with 50% good toexcellent results.Only 1 patient had fur<strong>the</strong>r revision to a proximal femoral replacement and constrained cup in 2stages for recurrent infection at 24 months.There were 2 recurrent infections (both revised for septic loosening) and 1 non-union <strong>of</strong>trochanteric osteotomy.There were no dislocations in <strong>the</strong> group. No radiological loosening <strong>of</strong> implants or metal ioncomplications have been seen at last follow up.Conclusions:We believe this is <strong>the</strong> first reported series on <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> large diameter metal on metal bearingsurfaces for revision hip arthroplasty. Our series shows satisfactory short to medium termresults in this complex group <strong>of</strong> patients with no component loosenings, despite monoblockcups and no dislocations.file:///E|/<strong>ISTA</strong>2010-Abstracts.htm[12/7/2011 3:15:47 PM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!