11.07.2015 Views

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

observers were able to do <strong>the</strong> experiment without surgical assistants. They found <strong>the</strong> templatesto be user-friendly and could be uniquely positioned, and held with one or 2 hands.DISCUSSIONMany authors 3,4,16,20,40 have questioned <strong>the</strong> accuracy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> surgical techniques for TKA, usingconventional instrumentation. The outcome <strong>of</strong> TKA is dependent on surgical techniques 7,8,36 ,and technical errors such as malalignment, may lead to early failure. 15,17,33,44 Variations insurgical performance and outliers in TKA still occur, and <strong>the</strong>y may affect <strong>the</strong> outcome. 15-17,41Although <strong>the</strong> reported long-term implant survival for TKA in elderly patients is 90–95% after10–15 years. 12,32,33 , some authors have questioned <strong>the</strong> high success rates due, to pitfalls inoutcome measurement. 27,28 There is also a need to improve <strong>the</strong> relatively inferior outcomeresults <strong>of</strong> TKA for young, active patients, and revision surgery 32,35,38 , where <strong>the</strong> accuracy <strong>of</strong>bone cutting is critical and errors can result in depletion <strong>of</strong> bone stock.Navigation and robotic techniques have recently been introduced, and several authors reported<strong>the</strong>ir higher level <strong>of</strong> accuracy, compared with conventional instrumentations. 3,4,6,30,37,40However, navigation techniques still rely on conventional instrumentation for making <strong>the</strong>various bone cuts, and <strong>the</strong>y require additional instruments and insertion <strong>of</strong> tracking pins. Thisdouble instrumentation system (navigation and conventional instrumentations) may overloadhospital inventory, sterilization services, and operating room time. The need to improveergonomics in <strong>the</strong> surgical workplace 39 would be more difficult with bulky navigation devicesthat require registration and continuous line <strong>of</strong> sight for tracking.Patient specific templating is ano<strong>the</strong>r form <strong>of</strong> computer-assisted surgery and is based on <strong>the</strong>application <strong>of</strong> rapid prototyping technology. The latter has been used in dentistry andmaxill<strong>of</strong>acial surgery but its medical applications are still in <strong>the</strong>ir infancy. 24 Radermacher 31 firstreported this technique in orthopaedic applications, and <strong>the</strong>re are few scattered reports 2,9 in <strong>the</strong>literature describing its use for producing customized models and guides. A new generation <strong>of</strong>patient specific templating has been reported 10,11 , where templates act as a complete set <strong>of</strong>instruments for TKA that replace conventional instrumentation. The results <strong>of</strong> using thistechnique in 45 experimental TKA procedures, on 16 cadaveric and 29 plastic specimens werereported 11 . The templates eliminated medullary guides and significantly reduced operative time.The accuracy results were based on <strong>the</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> postoperative CT scans for 6 randomcadaveric specimens. However, <strong>the</strong>re was concern about <strong>the</strong> accuracy and reproducibility <strong>of</strong>positioning patient specific templates, particularly for new users.The technique <strong>of</strong> patient specific templating has its own drawbacks, as it requires CT scans,which are not a routine requirement for TKA. Unlike navigation, templating techniques do notnormally provide intraoperative measurements, since sizing, alignment and bone cutting aredetermined preoperatively. This study also has some limitations. The measurements for femoralrotation were only done for 3 observers, and were not complete. This was justified in <strong>the</strong>Methods section. Measurements were also done before, ra<strong>the</strong>r than after bone cutting. This had<strong>the</strong> advantage <strong>of</strong> eliminating errors, which are surgeon-dependent, ra<strong>the</strong>r than templatedependent.Intraoperative measurements using <strong>the</strong> current navigation techniques are routinelyperformed before bone cutting, as <strong>the</strong> cutting process itself cannot be navigated due to <strong>the</strong>vibration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> saw blades. It was also found to be unnecessary to waste resources and time, byfile:///E|/<strong>ISTA</strong>2010-Abstracts.htm[12/7/2011 3:15:47 PM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!