11.07.2015 Views

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

design seems to solved completely this issue. This study sustains PSNA, DBSNG, PGRD asreliable measures to predict scapular notching. Besides eccentric SMR glenosphere seems toincrease R.O.M. mostly in flexion, abduction and adduction.FiguresFigure 1 Figure 2Thursday, October 7, 2010, 10:20-11:00Session A3: Bearing Mobility IssuesPost-Cam Kinematics in TKP*Hendrik Delport - AZ Nikolaas - Sint Niklaas, BelgiumWard Bartels - Catholic University - Leuven, BelgiumScott A. Banks - University <strong>of</strong> Florida - Gainesville, FL, USAJos Van der Sloten - Catholic University - Leuven, BelgiumJohan Bellemans, - Catholic University - Leuven, Belgium*Email: hendrik.delport@telenet.beIn general TKA can be divided into two distinct groups : cruciate retaining and cruciatesubstituting. The cam and post <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> latter system is in fact a mechanical substitution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>intricate posterior cruciate ligament.In our previous work we and many o<strong>the</strong>r investigatorshave focused on <strong>the</strong> movement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> femoral component relative to <strong>the</strong> tibial tray. Littleinformation is available about <strong>the</strong> relative movement between <strong>the</strong> cam part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> femoralcomponent and <strong>the</strong> post <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tibial insert.In this study we determine <strong>the</strong> distance and <strong>the</strong>changes in distance between <strong>the</strong> cam <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> femoral component and <strong>the</strong> tibial post duringextension, flexion at 90° and full flexion.The secondary purpose is to analyse possibledifferences between FBPS and MBPS TKA.Methods :12 subjects’ knees were imaged using fluoroscopy from extension over 90° to maximumkneeling flexion. The images were digitized. The 3-dimensional (3D) position and orientation<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> implant components were determined using model-based shape-matching techniques,manual matching, and image-space optimization routines. The implant surface model wasprojected onto <strong>the</strong> geometry-corrected image, and its 3D pose was iteratively adjusted to matchits silhouette with <strong>the</strong> silhouette <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> subject’s TKA components. The results <strong>of</strong> thisshapematching process have standard errors <strong>of</strong> approximately 0.5° to 1.0° for rotations and 0.5mm to 1.0 mm for translations in <strong>the</strong> sagittal plane.Joint kinematics were determined from <strong>the</strong>3D pose <strong>of</strong> each TKA component using <strong>the</strong> 3-1-2 Cardan angle convention. This processresulted in a distance map <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> femoral and tibial surfaces, from which <strong>the</strong> minimumseparations were determined for <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> this study between cam and post (fig1.).Separation distances between <strong>the</strong> tibial polyethylene (PE) insert’s post and <strong>the</strong> femoralfile:///E|/<strong>ISTA</strong>2010-Abstracts.htm[12/7/2011 3:15:47 PM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!