11.07.2015 Views

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

Convened under the auspicious of esteemed endorsers - ISTA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Wedges and Stems as well as <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> different degrees <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> constrain a kneefamily permits us to treat complicated primary as well as mild to moderate revision cases.Saturday, October 9, 2010, 13:30-14:20Session B20: Hip ArthroplastyA Hip Replacement Program in Burkina Faso: Review <strong>of</strong> 104 Cases*Lieven Dossche - Antwerp University Hospital - Edegem, BelgiumJan Noyez - Heilig Hart Ziekenhuis - Roeselare, BelgiumWim Bruyneel - CH Mouscron - Mouscron, BelgiumWindemi Ouedraogo - CMA Paul VI - Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso*Email: lieven.Dossche@uza.beWe report on our experience <strong>of</strong> a THR program set up in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso (BF). AsTHR is not performed on a regular basis in this country, we had to start it up completely. Wework in BF during a 2 weeks period in December each year. We do this in coöperation with alocal surgeon who makes a preselection <strong>of</strong> THR candidates in advance. This surgeon is trainedby us to do <strong>the</strong> necessary follow up and can contact us all year round in case <strong>of</strong> specificproblems. From 2004 until 2009 we performed 104 operations; <strong>the</strong>se consisted <strong>of</strong> 98 THR, 2bipolar hip replacements and 4 revisions. 3 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se revisions were <strong>of</strong> hip replacementsperformed by us; 1 revision was <strong>of</strong> a THR performed in France. Mean age at operation was 48,4years. All operations were performed by an anterolateral approach with use <strong>of</strong> cementedimplants. Reason for operation was degenerative arthritis in 31 (29,8%), AVN in 39 (37,5%),fracture in 30 (28,9%). Fractures were more than several months old in most cases. Reason for<strong>the</strong> revision operations was aseptic loosening in 3 cases and peripros<strong>the</strong>tic fracture in 1.For every operation, technical problems were recorded, if applicable. These problems were notnecessarily complicatons. We recorded 50 technical problems in 31 patients. 73 operations(70,2%) were performed without any note <strong>of</strong> technical problem. Most frequently recordedproblems were important shortening <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> leg (6), very narrow femoral canal (6), difficultreduction (5), peroperative femoral fracture (4-excluding trochanter maior fracture), extensivefibrosis (4), blocked femoral canal (3).Flexible reamers were used in 5 cases.There were 2 peri-operative deaths: one patient died after a postoperatieve sickle cell crisis withhemolysis. One patient developed a pulmonary embolism. Both patients were Hb SC.We recorded 21 complications in 16 patients. The majority were osseous complications. Thesewere 4 femoral fractures <strong>of</strong> which 3 had clinical repercussion, 4 trochanteric fractures withoutany clinical repercussion and 4 peroperative perforations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> femoral canal, all withoutpostoperative clinical repercussion. O<strong>the</strong>r complications were infection (2), paralysis <strong>of</strong> femoralnerve (1), burn injury by dia<strong>the</strong>rmia plate (1), postoperative hemolysis (1), pulmonaryembolism (1) and dislocation (2). One infection and dislocation was found in <strong>the</strong> same patient.file:///E|/<strong>ISTA</strong>2010-Abstracts.htm[12/7/2011 3:15:47 PM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!